Crusader Knight

Caucuses Are Anti-Democracy

2012-02-09T20:44:00.004-06:00

The use, by some political parties, of "caucuses" to directly-or-indirectly select candidates for presidential nominating conventions is very much in opposition to the best, democratic, traditions of the USA! Why?
Because they exclude: Members of the Armed Forces who serve well away from their home towns; Many fire-fighters (Many of whom serve 24-hour shifts); Police officers (Many of whose actual work hours exclude caucus participation); Medical professionals who may are assigned to work during caucus hours; Over-the-road truck drivers; The old, infirm and sick who still have active minds but cannot travel to caucus locations or tolerate the conditions of such meetings; And, many others in like straits.
Although some have cited such court cases as have concluded that such caucus systems are the "property" (Within the jurisdiction) of the sponsoring political parties. However, there are other court cases which have noted that those parties must provide for the equal treatment and paticipation without regard to race. The exclusion of the above cited (And other) Ameicans is as much a violation of our best principles---If not the Constitution.

Archbishop Dolan VS Full Natural Law

2012-01-29T14:45:00.004-06:00

Archbishop Timothy Dolan has (Again?) addressed the matter of Natural Law as basic
to respect-for-life (A). Yet, he (And so many others within and without the Church) inflict the same platitudes on use and avoid the "hard questions" as to Natural Law.

Those (eg Archbishop Timothy Dolan) who present "glittering generalities" about the above noted subjects should be prepared AND should be required to address the following questions and points.
1. Does, in fact, Natural Law strictly allow the innocent to protect themselves against the attacks of the unjust?
2. Does the absence of such civil-or-military forces who are both able and willing to provide immediate-and-effective protection magnify that right to self-defense?
3. Does the absence of such immediate-and-effective government protection specially allow the innocent to have the means (ie Modern firearms and other weapons) to enforce the Natural Law right to self-defense?
4. Does that right stop at the first hesitation of the criminal-attacker OR extent to the prevention of such attacks in the immediate future? At some longer interval when the attacker has clearly indicted an intent to continue such attacks?
5. Does Natural Law extend a right OR duty to protect the innocent against like criminal attacks?
6. Does Natural Law (As understood by the Church) allow for the use of deadly force to protect the lives of innocent others?
7. Does the Church admit that Islam's teachings, goals and methods all combine to encourage, if not command (As the expressed will of the Allah of the followers of the false prophet Mohammed), murder, rape, banditry, genocide, suppression of all true religions and of all other ideologies as well as that of all women and all Non-Muslims?
8. Does the Church still accept or now deny the validity of the teachings of that "Doctor Of The Church, St. Bernard Of Clairvaux (In his De Laude Militae Novae; E.), that it is sometimes necessary, if not required, that the faithful "Strike (Deadly) Blows For Christ"---If, and only if, the Christian warrior is without selfish or illicit motives? In doing so we would be "Good Shepherds".

If, and only if, Archbishop (And others) wish to teach about Natural Law, protecting life and like subjects, he (And they) must address the "hard questions" lest he (They) fail of the duty to fully teach "The Splendor Of Truth"

Vocational Education In/For Wisconsin

2012-01-22T10:21:00.001-06:00

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel should be thanked for its publication of Mr. Buckley Brinkman's column ("Shortage requires unified effort"; Jan. 1. 2012; Page-4J) supporting vocational education and the self-direction (Or, guiding) of our youths towards trade-and-vocational education and careers.

It would have been much better to have printed it on Page-1J and "above the fold" as the editors did for the platitudes and "glittering generalities" they inflicted on its readers, from "professional educators" and other self-serving politicians, some few weeks ago.

Yet, I think that Mr. Brinkman too conservative as to specific recommendations for the good of our youth and our economy. Below you will find a partial list (I invite additions or alternatives) towards the above cited goal.

1. The selection of vocational school board members is: Archaic and does not represent the many and accelerating changes in our economic world as "quotas" are set for persons of certain positions; And, is most undemocratic as as the People do not select those members from the best qualified candidates (Who, in a direct election, could tout such factors as work experience, prior vocational education, union membership, industrial-executive experience and like factors). Therefore, I suggest that vocational board members be directly elected by the citizens who pay for those schools.
2. As Mr. Brinkman mentioned student loan debt, I suggest that student loans for our many vocational schools be: Limited to those students in GED/HSEHS ED and purely vocational/professional programs (eg Fire fighting, Nursing, "Body Shop"; Plumbing); And, excluding those (eg Liberal Arts, ESL) for which the onus of payment should be on the student and not the tax payer---Especially in the light of loan defaults on such "non-economic" loans).
3. To maximize returns on the investment in vocational education all "Affirmative Action" programs or any "quotas" must be eliminated.
Entry must be for the best qualified applicants as based on "cultural fair" educational (Reading and mathematics skills) and job-related skills as might be obtained from natural ability, out-of-school-learning and tested by such means as are familiar to guidance and vocational-rehabilitation counselors.
4. It would be best if we were not wasting tax moneys on such programs that over-produce technical school graduates for whom there is only a limited (Or, nonexistent) demand. Therefore one State agency must ask other governmental units, unions, professional and industrial organizations (eg Auto Body Shop owners) Etc. to submit (eg Once every two years) their data and conclusions as to the numbers and needs for trained workers over the following ten years AND their recommendations as to the types of training & retraining (Do not forget Mr. Brinkman's comments as to the changing nature of our technology) needed to meet those goals.
Those who do not wish to cooperate should be "reminded" that they will be cut out of relevant, job filling-and-producing, private-sector-union-building and profit-making decisions-and-actions.
The data collected and processed must result in decisions as to which programs are to be established or expanded or suspended or cut-back or eliminated.
5. The regional differences in such results must not be ignored.
6. The unions and business interests cited above should be "solicited" to underwrite
(eg An up-to-date Body Shop training center)---Especially where there is a considerable demand for some particular cluster of training OR retraining skills.
7. In exchange for all of the above efforts and expenditures by business and union interests, we should change our State's laws (And Constitution) to allow, as necessary, binding (NOT subject to bankruptcy proceedings, for which some "waiver" might be necessary from the Congress) "Apprenticeship Contracts" (aka Indentures) to "bind" young workers to specific employers for set periods-of-time, performance standards, pay rates and other such matters. [There may be a body of well tested and applicable law and models still in place in Germany upon which Wisconsin-specific laws could be crafted.]
8. All appropriate high school staff must be retrained as to counseling students on the opportunities offered by vocational training and careers----And, evaluated as to their performance in that area. State Superintendent of Schools "Tony" Evers should also be evaluated, by editors and the People, as to his performance in this area.

I look for relevant, creative and true action by Governor Walker, the Legislature and other State agencies.

STOP! Rethink U-Wisconsin Education

2012-01-22T08:49:00.001-06:00

UW President Kevin Reilly is reported touting the goal of boosting the number of university graduates in Wisconsin. It appears that he is claiming that such would aid the luring of companies to our State and the boosting of Wisconsin's economy.

If, and only if, those are the goals of UW they would be better served by enacting and enforcing the following steps:
1. Eliminate all "remedial education" and related "coaching" programs within UW (With many savings in staff costs);
2. Admit to both undergraduate and graduate (eg Law and medicine) programs only the academically best qualified by, among other means, eliminating all "affirmative action" policies and programs (For more such savings);
3. Make it a matter of UW policy that quotas are to be set-and-maintained for designation as "undergraduate majors" and graduate programs in proportion to the economic demand for persons, with such degrees, in our labor market (For myself, I suggest that there may be more persons being issued degrees in Social Work, Black Studies, Women's Studies and like areas that there is any, if any, demand for by employers);
4. Reduce the number of "Assistants" and "Deputies" in all academic positions by not less than 50%, a change which will save millions-of-dollars and that without any probable harm to students.
5. Required that a set part (eg 50%) of patent-licensing-fees, copyright-payments "earned" by UW faculty and other staff while employed (And using UW facilities and staff to develop or publish) be paid into the General Fund of the State or, at the least, UW's General Fund and NOT siphoned off to some entity not under the control of the Legislature or Regents.

Most importantly, it appears (On the basis of the best information available to me) that the real need of our employers will be persons trained in manufacture-related skills by our excellent Technical Colleges (Which should take the same cost saving measures noted above)! Therefore, the Legislature and our Governor should focus more state resources (Dependent on execution of the cost savings measures noted above) on those technical college AND inform UW that it must control AND cut-back its spending as outlined above.

Islam And Slavery

2012-01-16T07:55:00.002-06:00

The Koran views slavery as a “permanent fact of human existence” and “explicitly guarantees Muslims the right to own slaves” (See “Islam's Wretched Record On Slavery”; Front Page Magazine; 11-10-02; By Mr. Serge Trifkovich), In that article Mr. Trifkovich gives further evidence of he horrors of slavery in general, but especially as to the length of such slavery by “muslims”, the working-to-death or castration of most such slaves. (Unlike the USA or Brazil or other places where the descendants of slaves are form a great part of the populations, the lack of such descendants in Arab nations, along with the record of Arab enslavement of Blacks, support the fact that such slaves were not allowed to breed, it being “more economical” to enslave work ready adults.)

Left Coasts TO Flyover Zone Translations

2011-12-30T17:56:00.000-06:00

Diverse or Lifestyle Choice---> Sinful and Perverted, Death Orientated

Arsenal of Weapons---> Gun Collection

Delicate Wetlands---> Swamps

Undocumented Worker--->Illegal Alien

Cruelty-Free Materials--->Non-renewable Synthetic Fiber

Heavily Armed Fanatic--->Well-protected & law abiding citizen

Narrow-minded---> Righteous, moral and maintainer of Western Civilization

Taxes or Your Fair Share---> Coerced Theft

Common sense Gun Control--->Gun Confiscation Plot

llegal Hazardous Explosives--->Fireworks or Stump Removal

Nonviable Tissue Mass---> Unborn Baby

Equal Access to Opportunity--->Ignorance of abilities and work-related experience

Multicultural Community---> High Crime Area

Fairness or Social Progress---> Marxism

Upper Class or “The Rich”---> Self-Employed job and technology creators

Homeless or Disadvantaged---> Bums or Welfare Leeches

Sniper Rifle---> Scoped Deer Rifle (For limiting dangerous car-critter impacts)

Healthcare Reform--->Socialized Medicine Extremist

Judgmental, or Hater---> Conservative who bases judgements on history & experience

Victim or Oppressed---> Criminal or Lazy Good-For-Nothing

High Capacity Magazine----> Standard Capacity Magazine

Religious Zealot---> Church-going, God fearing & loving

Fair Trade Coffee----> Overpriced Yuppie Coffee

Exploiters or “The Rich”---> Employers or Land Owners

The Gun Lobby---> NRA Members & others who support FULL constitutional rights

Assault Weapon----> Semi-Auto (Grandpa’s M1 Carbine) or self-loading duck gun

Fiscal Stimulus----> New Taxes & Higher Taxes wasted on boondoggles

Same Sex Marriage---->Legalized Perversion

Mandated Eco-Friendly Lighting---> Chinese Mercury-Laden Light Bulbs designed to make citizens so blind and brain damaged that they will continue to vote for the Left.

Active public demonstration---->Mob actions as present suitable targets for WMD

Islamist---->Terrorist who believes in the same teachings, goals and practices of other Muslims (Stays under cover until "affirmative acts" are executed---Along with hostages)

On CCW, Liability, Constitutions & "Posting"

2011-12-23T14:56:00.002-06:00

The usual "much heat and little light" has been generated by those opposed to our democratically elected Legislature ruling that no minimum number of hours of "gun training" is needed to obtain a permit to carry concealed weapons.

Beyond consideration of the carrying of weapons is a basic constitutional right (Endorsed by President Thomas Jefferson, the Supreme Court of the USA and the People of Wisconsin in Article-I, Section-25 of their Constitution) all should remember that the carrying of such lumpy devices is a personal choice. Doing so puts such free citizens as exercise that right at very great personal risk of arrest, imprisonment, lawyers' fees, costs and damages if they use-or-misuse weapons---Even if found "Not Guilty" in any criminal case AND found not financially responsible in civil cases.

From a political-philosophical point-of-view it is important that the decision to carry or use weapons is a personal and not "nanny state" choice. The many persons, chiefly in "certain neighborhoods" who have been illegally carrying and criminally misusing guns for many years made their personal choices. I doubt me that those who get CCW licenses will demonstrate any parallel patterns of misuse---As demonstrated in those States which have "must issue" CCW-permit laws---Without regard to the training received.

When my CCW-permit arrives, I will carry to, if nothing else, exercise a constitutional right too long suppressed by the proponents of the "nanny state" and other forms of tyranny.

Those who persecute, rather than ethically-and-legally prosecute gun carrying and self-defense-using citizens are tyrants. They must and shall be removed from appointed or elective office.

Why CCW Is Better Than Open Carry

2011-12-23T14:50:00.002-06:00

One of the disadvantages of the open carrying of weapons (For some time allowed to all adult citizens not on probation or parole) is contained in the unlawful harassment of some legally (And openly) "carrying" citizens in Madison, WI. That case involved a mob of Madison, WI police officers confronting five such legally, openly and peacefully armed citizens. Those who overcame probable fear of unstable an unconstitutional armed police officers were illegally arrested. That asinine police misbehavior cost the City of Madison $10,000.00.

Milwaukee has Edward (SS-und PolizieFuhrer) Flynn who has stated that "his" (Gee whiz, I thought they "belonged" to the citizens of that city) officers are to "take to the ground" any (Openly) armed person until they can "prove" they have a right to go armed. With that prior statement, I suggest that any citizen attacked in that manner should NOT settle for less than $100,000.00.

The other reasons for concealed carry are:
A. To avoid upsetting those immature persons who get upset stomachs and egos upon seeing an armed and law-abiding citizen who is, I presume, willing and able to defend self against criminal attacks---And to protect fellow citizens;
B. To not draw the first fire of such criminals and to allow the armed citizen to "surprise" such critters.

"Dhimmitude" In The Media

2011-12-14T08:39:00.002-06:00

Dhimmitude is the state of being in very humble subjection to Islam and Muslims. This fatal (To intellectual and journalistic honesty) disease has infected most of the media (Including such otherwise honest sources as Fox News).

Jihad is primarily Muslims' use of force against persons who are not Muslims in obedience to the directives of Islam's inventor (Mohammed of Mecca & Medina) to force them to either convert to Islam OR to grovel in a state of dhimmitude.

A recent and most troubling example of this is the failure of the Press to report that the persons responsible for the recent mass killings in Belgian, shootings in Hollywood (California) and other like incidents were Muslims apparently on jihad.

The "duty" to be involved in such jihad activities is binding on every Muslim male and does not require any authorization by any Islamic group or religious-political authority (eg A Caliph)

The horrid plague of dhimmitude has a very special locus in such places as the Associated Press which infects many newspapers---Especially those which do not "check the facts" before reprinting AP stories.

A Short Lesson As To Islam

2011-12-10T16:53:00.001-06:00

THIS BOILS DOWN THE MINIMUM DATA NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND ISLAM.

Defining Islam---Again

1. Islam is NOT a religion; But, is a criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology not far
different from the KKK or Nazi-Party (Sharing the same principles of hate-of-Jews and all real religions, use of violence and the other horrors taught in Mein Kampf and the Koran;
2. Islam (Like the KKK, Mafia and the SS brand of Nazism) has/had a very thin veneer of religion;
3. The false-prophet Mohammed (Who was a murderer, liar and treaty breaker, bandit and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child) declared perpetual war against all "unbelievers" (Until they join Islam or accept the slave-like state of dhimmitude), a war which continues in our era in the Sudan, Thailand, parts of the Philippines,,Fort.Hood and New York City on "9/11";
4. Most Mosques are, to some extent, funded by the most regressive, medieval and anti-civilization branch of Islam (ie Wahhabism) and use that sect's hate literature, much printed in Saudi Arabia;
5. Lying to "unbelievers" is one of the standard and common responses of Muslims to any questions, about their ideology, from "unbelievers", including before the Courts in the USA whose authority Muslims do NOT recognize;
6. Muslims "behave themselves" ONLY until their part of any local, regional or national population reaches certain levels (eg France; "Londonistan"; the Nordic nations; Dearborn, Michigan);
7. The true believers of Islam must believe that the words of the the Koran are directly from its Allah (Not the same as Arabic speaking Christians) and, along with the sayings and examples of Mohammed, are totally binding on them;
8. The declared goals of Islam include: The destruction or effective suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all real religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslims; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement.
9. The allowed, approved and too often commanded methods of Islam and Muslims to achieve those goals include: Murder and mutilation; Rape and enslavement; Genocide;
Perpetual war with "unbelievers" until they become Muslims or accept the slave-like state of "dhimmitude"; Lying to "unbelievers" as the approved and commanded tactic of Muslims as to "pointed questions" regarding Islam; AND, the consideration of any resistance to or complaints about Islam as an attack which the "faithful" are required to counter-attack, very often by physical attack.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Supporting Islam = Treason (#2)

I have elected to apply the "KISS Principle" to this matter.
1. Treason, under our Constitution, is limited to waging war against the USA (Which includes adhering-to or supporting those who are active in such acts).
2. Islam has been in a state of self-declared war against all non-Muslims for 1400-years.
3. Islam requires all of its adult male members to either be personally involved in such warfare
(Jihad) or to "support it with all their wealth".
4, Much (Most?) of all contributions to "Islamic Charities" ends up, as the Koran commands (Please see #3 above) in the hands of terrorists whose program includes attacks on the USA.
5. No believing Muslim will publicly condemn or deny those parts of the Koran or other Islamic teachings which call for such wars---Including against the non-Muslim citizens of and lawful visitors to the USA.

SUPPORTING ISLAM AND ITS ONGOING WAR AGAINST ALL OTHERS (INCLUDING THE USA) IS TREASON.

Effective Control Of US Border

2011-12-06T12:06:00.002-06:00

It is NOT sufficient to merely order units of the National Guard to the border. They must be given "general orders" as will allow them to protect the USA. I suggest the following.

A GENERAL ORDER

1. All persons entering the USA at other than approved places, manned by the Border Patrol, are invaders.
2. All such persons are to immediately be forced back across the border by use of such force as is required to do so.
3. Any such persons who are armed are to be immediately fired upon and that without warning.
4. If the Border Patrol or the Armed Forces of the USA (Or, civilians under their protection) are fired upon from across our border, the Border Patrol and the Armed Forces will react to such attacks by small arms fire, field guns or aviation delivered ordinance.
5. The National Guard, Army and, if necessary, the General Militia shall support the emplacement of not less than six coils of "razor ribbon" (aka "Barbed Tape") for the full length of the fence to be completed along the Southern Border of the USA.

The Good Shepherd Vs. The Wolves

2011-12-04T15:07:00.004-06:00

Jesus the Christ very firmly declared that He was the "Good Shepherd". What then does such a person do when wolves attack to take away or kill the sheep, lambs and (Like myself) "old goats" of his flock? Why, any good shepherd will use his rod and staff (Both weapons!) or, like the Psalmist David) some other weapon (eg A projectile weapon called the sling) to drive away or, better yet to prevent future predation, kill the wolves. The good shepherd will realize that it is useless to "reach out" to wolves or to forgive them as they remain what they are and that without mercy or consideration of the rights of the shepherd or his charges NOR any willingness to reform even if "forgiven".

Today, those wolves who attack Jesus' flocks are usually: Those who obey the horrid teachings of the false prophet Mohammed; Aggressive "secular humanists" (ie Atheists) who use the force (Too often of civil law) to inflict their goals upon Christians and other believers; And, that especially rabid sub-group, those who perform elective abortions and those who support them.

Those of us who are willing to be "Assistant Good Shepherds" (Or even sheep/guard dogs) in the defense of the flocks of innocents should recall what good shepherds do as to predatory wolves! Attack and destroy!

A Response To CAIR

2011-11-26T08:45:00.001-06:00

The email below was sent to the director of CAIR.

Defining Islam---Again

Equitable Responces To Islamic Attacks

There is a world-wide campaign of attacks against Jewish, Christian Buddhist. Sikh and other true religions' communities, places-of-worship and individuals by Muslims acting alone (As a result of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"), small groups, larger mobs and regional OR world wide organizations.

Yet, when any Muslim is asked about such attacks, their usual response is that, "Oh. those are the other and radicalized Muslims". That is a lie OR a much more dangerous "half-truth" or "half-lie"---For the following reasons.
1. All Muslims must believe that the whole of the Koran are the actual words of their Allah and may not be altered or modified or softened by any person since the death of Mohammed AND such commandments and examples are to be followed;
2. The Koran (Along with the sayings of Mohammed and the examples of his life) encourage or allow, and often command, the use of murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, banditry, perpetual war with "unbelievers", sexual use of girl-children as young as nine-years-of-age and the other horrors taught by that creature.
3. One of the best kept secrets of Islam is that all Muslims consider themselves of a world-wide brotherhood (ie Ummah) with full responsibility for each other and with a duty to support each other against the "unbelievers".

Since #3 above is true, I see no reason to NOT hold any Muslim (Group) responsible for the actions of ANY other Muslim Group(s) anywhere in the world.

Therefore, the burning of a Christian Church in Egypt could result in the like destruction of a Mosque in the USA or Londonistan or Paris. The like destruction of a Sikh temple (Gurdwara) in Cape Town would result in parallel and counter action in Denmark. The same should hold for Muslims' attacks Synagogues, Hindu-Buddhist temples, Etc..

The just means of doing so would require:
1. Prior and world-wide warning of such actions-to-come if the noted Islamic attacks do not fully stop;
2. Further such warnings after the first few instances of such "reactions";
3. That should be done without hate or other illicit passions and only as a "teaching example"or matter-of-justice or "balancing Karma". [For traditional Christians, the teachings of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his "De Laude Militae Novae" should be applied .]
4. Unlike Muslims, others should not attack women children and should attempt to, as much as possible, minimize "collateral damage".

It may be that Muslims will not respond to such attacks by stopping their attacks as they worship death and welcome such for their Allah (NOT the same as Arabic speaking Christians and other non-Muslims).

But, we must remember that compromise with evil is evil and our human and basic goal, under "Natural Law", is Justice above Peace.

Those who object by saying "Do you want to start a war with 1.5 Billion Muslims should be remember that Mohammed declared perpetual war against "unbelievers", which war obviously continues to this day.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Supporting Islam = Treason (#2)

I have elected to apply the "KISS Principle" to this matter.
1. Treason, under our Constitution, is limited to waging war against the USA (Which includes adhering-to or supporting those who are active in such acts).
2. Islam has been in a state of self-declared war against all non-Muslims for 1400-years.
3. Islam requires all of its adult male members to either be personally involved in such warfare (Jihad) or to "support it with all their wealth".
4, Much (Most?) of all contributions to "Islamic Charities" ends up, as the Koran commands (Please see #3 above) in the hands of terrorists whose program includes attacks on the USA.
5. No believing Muslim will publicly condemn or deny those parts of the Koran or other Islamic teachings which call for such wars---Including against the non-Muslim citizens of and lawful visitors to the USA.

SUPPORTING ISLAM AND ITS ONGOING WAR AGAINST ALL OTHERS (INCLUDING THE USA) IS TREASON.

Friday, April 29, 2011

A Theoretical Note On Fuel Air Bombs

On a purely theoretical basis, I understand that taking an agricultural, high-pressure, large-volume-output spraying apparatus, filling the "pesticide" tanks with light fuel oil, using "liquid-petroleum-gas" rather than air as a carrier, spraying such into the largest room of a large building and then suddenly igniting that cloud (eg With a flare-or-rocket from the type of projector often found in ships' life-boats) will result in the destruction of that large building.

Now, what made me think of this?

Perhaps, it was the usual floor plans of certain buildings used by a well-known,international and 1400-year-old criminal-terrorist movement-or-ideology
(eg As planned for downtown New York City and Copenhagen, Denmark).
===========================================================

Come and play with me as I have some new "Dragon Breath" rounds for my shotgun and a new handgun I have yet to try out on live targets.

"When In The Course Of Human Events"--Again

2011-11-19T16:17:00.000-06:00

"When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another..." is the beginning of the Declaration Of Independence as chiefly authored by Thomas Jefferson. After that beginning he set down a "Bill Of Particulars And Complaints" which pointed out the "reasons why" Americans could and must separate themselves from an overbearing, central, government much too concerned with the letter-letter-of-the-law and which government had lost sight of the spirit-of-the-law. as applies to any democracy. [They should also read the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.]

Have we gone full circle?

It is well that private citizens of the USA hold 200,000,000-plus firearms, many of military grade AND hold within themselves the knowledge on how to properly use them.

Furthermore, I will consider any official who signs the USA onto the UN (Useless Nations) "Small Arms Treaty" a person who is waging war on the Constitution, the People of the USA and this nation. Such such a person is a traitor and is subject to arrest (With any level of force needed to do so) and subject to trial (By a "Peoples Court" if within no other venue).

Muslim Soldiers As Threats To The USA

2011-11-15T08:53:00.001-06:00

On July 28, 2011 came the news that an AWOL Muslim soldier was arrested at the same gun shop (On warning to the police by an as usual law-abiding gun-store owner) where Major Nidal Hasan , of Ft. Hood infamy, bought his weapons before waging jihad-war against the USA and his fellow soldiers as an aggravated act of treason. This latest Muslim soldier-traitor was asking how to build a bomb.

It seems more-than-strange that politicians, publishers-and-editors, teachers, non-Muslim religious leaders and others cannot "connect the dots" and come to the only rational decision, which is that no adult-male Muslim can be trusted to not suddenly, alone or with others, go on military-jihad and wage war against the USA, which is treason (7).

We should demand that the persons noted above (Especially the MJS editors) admit to a realistic definition of Islam (As NOT a religion and AS a clear-and-present danger to the People of the USA and all civilized nations) and stop being "politically correct" !

Charging Fees For CCW Permit (In Wisconsin)

2011-11-01T10:38:00.007-05:00

Wisconsin has become the 49th State to allow/require the issuance of permits to carry concealed weapons. But, it charges fees to obtains such a license. I maintain that such charges are unconstitutional on the basis of the constitutional provisions cited below as the full exercise of that basic right no less that the one-time charging of "Poll Taxes" to vote were excluded from public law.

WISCONSIN CONSTITUTION (ARTICLE-1, SECTION-25): The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose.

District Of Columbia Vs. Heller; 554 U. S. 570 (2008)

Harper Vs. Virginia Board Of Education; 383 US 663 (1966).

TWENTY-FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:
Section 1: The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice-President, for electors for President or Vice-President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay a poll tax or other tax.
Section2: The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Student Debt & U-Wisconsin Mismanagement

2011-10-30T09:34:00.003-05:00

It appears that Mr. Obama is attempting to bribe those (Most) college students and graduates in great debt due to the costs of their university education by some, unfunded and undefined plan to "help them". Whatever the case may be in other States, the cost of a University of Wisconsin education is aggravated by the mismanagement and fraud allowed, if not encouraged, by the Administration and Regents of that school.

The real goals of UW (NOT that of self-serving administrators and senior faculty) would be better served by enacting and enforcing the following steps:
1. Eliminate all "remedial education" and related "coaching" programs within UW (With many savings in staff costs);
2. Admit to both undergraduate and graduate (eg Law and medicine) programs only the academically best qualified by, among other means, eliminating all "affirmative action" policies and programs (For more such savings);
3. Make it a matter of UW policy that quotas are to be set-and-maintained for designation as "undergraduate majors" and graduate programs in proportion to the economic demand for persons, with such degrees, in our labor market (For myself, I suggest that there may be more persons being issued degrees in Social Work, Black Studies, Women's Studies and like areas that there is any, if any, demand for by employers);
4. Reduce the number of "Assistants" and "Deputies" in all academic positions by not less than 50%, a change which will save millions-of-dollars and that without any probable harm to students.
5. Required that a set part (eg 50%) of patent-licensing-fees, copyright-payments "earned" by UW faculty and other staff while employed (And using UW facilities and staff to develop or publish) be paid into the General Fund of the State or, at the least, UW's General Fund and NOT siphoned off to some entity not under the control of the Legislature or Regents.

Most importantly, it appears (On the basis of the best information available to me) that the real need of our employers will be persons trained in manufacture-related skills by our excellent Technical Colleges (Which should take the same cost saving measures noted above)! Therefore, the Legislature and our Governor should focus more state resources (Dependent on execution of the cost savings measures noted above) on those technical college AND inform UW that it must control AND cut-back its spending as outlined above.

Also, it would be best if UW were brought back under the control of the People by the direct election of its Regents (Perhaps with two from every Congressional district).

Democracy Is "GOOFY"---Per Chief Flynn

2011-10-19T08:14:00.001-05:00

We should all thank Milwaukee's Police Chief Flynn for enlightenment! During a recent "violence prevention" event at Marquette University he swept away all the cobwebs of ignorance and illusion and called our new concealed weapons law "GOOFY".

Until his illuminating statement I thought that the People who amended, by a considerable majority and secret ballot, our Constitution to make the keeping and bearing of arms a basic right were only acting in the traditions set down by such as President Thomas Jefferson.

Until that great revelation I was strangely confused by the three-times passage of a CCW law by our Legislature (Twice under Democrat-Party control, the first two vetoed by that party's nominal leader) was an expression of the democratic will of the People.

This "Glorious & Maximum Leader" should be crowned with the hero's laurels and like recognition.for so clearly demonstrating that democracy is "GOOFY".

Bible Does Condemn Homosexuality

2011-10-17T10:50:00.002-05:00

From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel of 17 October 2011 (Page15A).

HOMOSEXUALITY

Bible does condemn homosexual acts

It is absolutely incredible that Mark Achtemeier, in his op-ed "Celebrating this servant of God," would argue that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality as sinful (Perspectives, Oct. 11).

I have read through the Greek New Testament multiple times, read the Torah in Hebrew, translated the Aramaic portions of the Bible, edited a book on the text of Scripture and teach Greek and Hebrew at the college and seminary level in the Milwaukee area.

Old Testament texts such as: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination" (Lev 18:22) and New Testament texts such as Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, and many others, mean, in Greek and Hebrew, exactly what they mean in English.

Achtemeier's denomination decided, in the 1920s, to turn away from its former faith in an infallible Bible, an act that led to the resignation of the cream of the faculty of his denomination's seminary, Princeton, at that time.

If he agrees with his denomination that the Bible is filled with errors, let him say so. But to argue that the Bible does not condemn homosexual acts is an egregious misuse of the plain meaning of many passages.

(Author's Name Left Purposely Out)

What Divides The People Of The USA

2011-10-06T13:42:00.001-05:00

Mr. Snyder also seems confused over the basis of that division. Here, I can help define the nature of many such differences. Many US citizens (And legal immigrants) have finally come to an understanding of the following points as "reliable and valid".
1. There is a difference between good and evil.
2. Compromise with evil is evil in itself .
3. There is a difference between knowledge and ignorance.
4. Compromise with ignorance is ignorant.
5. There is a difference between what can be, on a reliable and valid basis, supported by experimental science and that which cannot be, but is too often claimed as "scientifically proven" .
6. There is a difference between the position that real science must constantly reevaluate its propositions and theories (Not equal to each other) and no scientific proposition (eg
The speed of light' Substantial human causes for climate change) is beyond question.
7. Without regard to its "sometimes" failures the traditional marriage of one man and one women has been clearly demonstrated, by history, as the basic-and-best unit of the nation and of civilization .
8. That spending beyond income will result in the ruination of an individual or family or a corporation or a nation.
9. There are major differences between Islam and the world's monotheistic religions
as make Islam the enemy of both any democracy and civilization (E, F).
10. The public acts of Mr. B. H. Obama are contrary to the best interests of the People of the USA (G).
11. That the original intent of the authors of the Constitution (And its amendments) should be the primary base for any judicial decisions as that basic document has NO provisions for "evolving standards of decency" or other judicial inventions BUT does have a prescribed method of change ,

I could list many more of the like divisions in this nation. It will up to the People (And, hopefully, not life-term Federal judges) , through the democratic election of its representatives, chose which positions will be public policy.

I do not see any openings for compromise on the above and many other subjects as they are too basic to the future of the nation.

A Future USA Under Sharia?

2011-10-03T16:59:00.002-05:00

Those interested in the ongoing debate as to Sharia law in the USA should attend to the above cited article as to the related goals of Muslims for a Islamic USA.

At first I thought this was a tongue-in-cheek parody; But, a review of Islamic teachings, goals and means (Both from its source materials, the Koran and Hadith and History) reveals that the horrid propositions are real and fully "Islamic".
============================================================

SHARIA IN AMERICA

By Ayesha Ahmed

Omar M. Ahmad founder of CAIR said:'Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant' he said. 'The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America , and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth,' he said.

Americans should give a serious thought to CAIR's agenda.. If Islam and sharia is adopted in America , It will be great.

Muslims are right. Non of the existing Islamic countries are truly Islamic, that is why they don't progress and most of them are poor, corrupt and miserable. We must implement 100% sharia and sunna to get full benefits of Islam. Inshallah we will try to do it in USA to make it the first real Muslim country after the days of rightly guided khalifas Consider the following advantages:

America can go to jihad against non Muslim countries. It will bring immense wealth in booty and millions of captured women. Canada and Mexico can be easy targets and are conveniently located for easy assault and hauling of booty.
Since slavery will be allowed government can open slave markets to sell it's 20% share of the captured women.
Captured women/slave-girls can provide affordable domestic help for house wives and clean enjoyable sex for their husbands
Enslaved men can be used as farm labor and factory workers at a much lower cost than unionized labor.
Unemployed men from the prohibited non Islamic businesses like TV, Photography, computers, mortgage companies, music industry etc can be hired as religious police for the Ministry of Prevention of Vice and Promotion of Virtues. They can be used to beat up women violating burqa laws, arrest men with undersize beards and whip the non religious types found loitering at prayer times.
Since men will be allowed four wives and unlimited number of slave girls, population boom will result in making the fastest growing religion grow even faster.
All non muslims will live under dhimmi rules and pay heavy Jizya. Budget deficits will be a thing of the past.
Stoning of adulterers, whipping of alcohol drinkers, cutting of hands and feet of thieves and beheadings of apostates can be carried out after Juma prayers on Fridays in the local stadium. Gate charge for this gory and exciting weekly spectacle can generate a lot of revenue.
Unemployed male gynecologists can be hired to carry out circumcisions of new male converts.
Female circumcision can be made mandatory to promote piety and holiness and discourage lewdness among women.
Marriage age for girls can be lowered to 6 years. That will reduce the burden of support of large poorer families and also promote a sunna, the tradition set by the holy prophet (peace be up on him).
Whole Ramadan will be declared as public holidays so that every one can pray and recite the Quran.. Why work in the only month in which all ibadah and Quran recitals are worth 70 times the normal sawab (reward)?
Shia Muslims on temporary out of town business assignments will be able to do a temporary marriage (Muta) and enjoy home comfort outside of home.
Since menstruation is a disease according to Quran all menstruating women will be given time off to rest in bed during their periods.
All toilet seats in the public rest rooms will be reoriented so that one does not defecate facing Mecca.
All public toilets will have buckets of stones instead of toilet tissues for claiming after defecation as a movement to implement sunna in the country.
Separate bins along roadside will be placed to drop bones and dried animal feces for jins to snack on.
Spiraling medical costs can be brought down by the following two prong approaches:
Imams can be placed in the clinics to recite Quranic ayas (verses) and blow on the patients and pray for them . Their fee will be a fraction of what doctor's charge.
All pharmacies will be required to dispense black cumin, honey, Indian incense and camel urine as cure for all diseases as recommended by the holy prophet (pbuh). The cost will be a fraction of today's medicines.
Spiralling prison costs will come down due to the following:
All men serving time for the crime of rape will be freed if four male witnesses had not testified in the trial. Even if four male witnesses had testified, the criminal will be freed under insanity provision , since only mentally insane will rape in front of four witnesses.
All men serving sentences for beating wives will be freed as under new American sharia law wife beating will be allowed.
All thieves will be freed after cutting their hands and feet.
All pedophiles will be freed as sex with children will not be against law any more.
All slayers of unbelievers will be freed if they converted to Islam.

All these result in savings and prosperity and happiness for all. InshaAllah!

Sharia In The USA---Now

2011-10-03T16:40:00.004-05:00

IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THE IMPACT OF SHARIA LAW YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING, AND EASILY OBTAINED, DOCUMENT.

Sharia Law and American State Courts; An Assessment Of State Appellate Court Cases;
The Center For Security Policy Occasional Paper Series; May 20, 2011.

CD available upon written request to that center at: 1901 Pennsylvania Avenue (Suite 201), Washington, DC 20006; OR, "info (at) securefreedom (dot) org".

Supporting Islam = Treason (#2)

2011-09-24T19:19:00.006-05:00

I have elected to apply the "KISS Principle" to this matter.
1. Treason, under our Constitution, is limited to waging war against the USA (Which includes adhering-to or supporting those who are active in such acts).
2. Islam has been in a state of self-declared war against all non-Muslims for 1400-years.
3. Islam requires all of its adult male members to either be personally involved in such warfare
(Jihad) or to "support it with all their wealth".
4, Much (Most?) of all contributions to "Islamic Charities" ends up, as the Koran commands (Please see #3 above) in the hands of terrorists whose program includes attacks on the USA.
5. No believing Muslim will publicly condemn or deny those parts of the Koran or other Islamic teachings which call for such wars---Including against the non-Muslim citizens of and lawful visitors to the USA.

SUPPORTING ISLAM AND ITS ONGOING WAR AGAINST ALL OTHERS (INCLUDING THE USA) IS TREASON. THE PENALTY FOR TREASON IS DEATH.

What Is True Charity?

2011-09-12T20:20:00.000-05:00

What is "charity"? Well, it is certainly NOT the mere transfer of property from one person (Or, "class") to another----Especially when demanded and enacted by governments.

"Charity" is the love (Charitas) underlying the free-and-voluntary giving of care, physical-emotional-spiritual, to others when they need any or all of such gifts---And, includes the spirit in which such are given. All of those gifts can best be given without the receiver knowing anything about the giver except the charitas sent with the gifts.

There are times-and-places (eg The South of the Sudan) when it is NOT enough to merely give BUT to also insure that the receiver has the protection-and-peace in which to use what has been given. In such cases the gift of physical protection must be given---But, seldom is. When it is, the suffering, blood, limbs and lives of protectors are also gifts of charitas.

These protectors are given and accept the vocation to help protect Christ's sheep-and-lambs (And such occasional goats, as "pathological pacifists", specially provided by the Church) as they are willing to to show that "greater love" (See John 15:13) which was so praised by the Christ.

Those protectors are called "WARRIORS" and may be members of armed forces---Or, such citizens who are willing to make the same gift of life.

Dealing With Neo-Nazis

2011-09-02T07:23:00.003-05:00

Neo-Nazis who go merely about, posturing in strange uniforms (Like the "Fruit Of Islam"), should be either ignored or treated to finger-pointing and belly-bending bouts of laughter---Either tactic defeating their goal of maintaining and stirring-up what is left of inter-racial hatred in the USA (As is the tactic of the "Nation Of Islam", Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson and such like critters).

Those Neo-Nazis, IF ANY, who misuse the right to keep and bear arms, attack-injure-kill their fellow citizens or support their desires-and-lusts by rape-and-robbery should be punished according to law. [If "The Law" does not effectively punish those crimes, then citizens, organized into companies of The General Militia or Committees-Of-Vigilance should do so in the effective traditions of the American People---A tactic recommended to such persons who live in "Black neighborhoods" to deal with the outlaws who dwell among them without effective actions by the police to prevent their crimes.]

Effective Dealing With Rioters

2011-08-14T08:35:00.011-05:00

The recent mob actions in Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Londonistan lead to the question of how to deal with rioters as individuals and groups. The "stuck in the 1960s" social theories and resultant actions do NOT do so.

AS INDIVIDUALS AND SMALL GROUPS: The police appear usually too few or too late OR too politically afraid to take such EFFECTIVE actions as will protect innocents from death or great bodily injury or life-destroying property damage by such individuals or small groups.

However, citizens in some places can assist the police my marking such rioters as evidence. The most effective way of doing so is by putting 0.32-inch (The size of "OO" buckshot) or 9mm or .38/.45/.30-inch holes in the bodies of such thugs.

Thereafter and when danger is past, the police can take out their little note-books and record the evidence left for them. (Please Note: A hard touch of a triangular file to the lands of a gun barrel and light touch to the tip of a firing-pin and extractor will neutralize the usual forensic evidence.)

(OH YES---The same "marking" can be utilized as to home-invaders, robbers, rapists, threatening drug dealers & gang-bangers, those followers of Mohammed who attack others who criticize them or their ideology or even include then in general photos in public places) Etc.

IN LARGE GROUPS: The proven best tactic is to have them (By their own actions or by external force) gathered together in one place (eg. A stadium as in the "Nike Riots" in Constantinople, for which see) and use it as a "surrender or die killing zone".

Black Mob Attack On Whites At State Fair

2011-08-05T15:14:00.004-05:00

On the evening of August 4, 2011 a very large mob of Black youths attacked Whites on and near the Wisconsin State Fair grounds.

Mr. "Rick" Frenette (CEO, Wisconsin State Fair) totally avoided the fact that the mob who attacked fair goers, inside and outside of the fair grounds, was made up of Black youths. The fair's police spokesman avoided, as much as was possible, that fact.

Mr. Frenette's "solution" to that Black mob action was to order that no youths (White, Black or Green) would be admitted to the fair park, after 5:00pm unless accompanied by adults. This action punishes, without "due process", all non-Black youths and ignores the realities of Black thugs selecting persons of other races as crime victims at a rate many, many, times the reverse.

Although I am somewhat interested in what excuses some (eg Those "Professional Blacks", NOT Black professionals, who make excuses for such misconduct) will make as to this event, I do know that any attack on me or mine at the fair would have such scum requiring major medical treatment---OR, that of the special attention of the Medical Examiner.

I also know that the police were, as usual, too few and too late (And, perhaps, too politically afraid) to protect my fellow citizens. Those free Americans should be prepared to do so in the future as an exercise of their legal right to self-defense and without regard to any laws or rules depriving them of the means to instantly do so

Breivik VS Jihadist: Irrational VS Rational Terrorists

2011-07-28T19:00:00.001-05:00

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Rational or Irrational?

In response to last night’s post about the psychopathy of Anders Behring Breivik, our longtime reader and commenter Blogger sent these brief observations on the apparent mental state of the killer:

People who don’t work in mental health have no idea how “normal” psychopaths (as well as irrational people) can present.

I work as a mental health nurse and we sometimes get patients who have written long narratives about various beliefs and philosophies. Their manuscripts are often included in their medical record, and the professionals read them to get background on the patient.

To the untrained observer, these people can come across as incredibly sane, often displaying even more developed ideas that we thought our own were. Those inexperienced in treating the mentally ill may wonder about their own sanity. But we nurses are used to it.

This Norwegian killer was your typical psychopath, and since they are often good-looking and intelligent, people also assume psychopaths are ‘rational’. But the actions of this psychopath are both evil and irrational. It makes no sense, logically, to advance a political stance by presenting it as evil.

An Islamic terrorist, on the other hand, is instructed by his or her highest authority, Allah, and the examples of Muhammad, whose actions Muslims are told to emulate. They are brainwashed.

Therefore the actions of a terrorist carrying out the commands of Allah are evil, but rational.

Winston Churchill On Islam & Obama's Response

2011-07-27T20:04:00.001-05:00

Winston Churchill on Islam

This is prescient:

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.

It comes our way via Bookwoorm who you should be reading daily. She goes deeper and does some juxtaposing and concluding:

Our government would do well to remember the nature of the forces arrayed against us, and to remember Churchill’s advice about recognizing the enemy sooner, rather than later:

“Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

But I think our current leader would be happy to live as a slave, because he does not see much in our culture that is worth saving by fighting. I know that Obama suffers from a vast historical ignorance, one he reveals on a regular basis, so I doubt he has more than a passing familiarity with Churchill’s life or thinking. Nevertheless, it was entirely fitting that our Quisling, Vichy-esque President, as one of his first acts in office, got rid of the Churchill reminder occupying space in his office, and sent it on an ignominious trip aback to its land of origin.

Guns: Thomas Jefferson---Again

2011-07-27T08:33:00.004-05:00

This is not a new concept. Cesare Baccaria outlined this truth in his seminal book Crimes & Punishments in 1764, in a passage that made such an impression upon Thomas Jefferson that he copied it into his daybook and quoted it at length in letters to his nephew and to James Madison:

"The laws of this nature are those which forbid to wear arms, disarming those only who are not disposed to commit the crime which the laws mean to prevent. Can it be supposed, that those who have the courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity, and the most important of the code, will respect the less considerable and arbitrary injunctions, the violation of which is so easy, and of so little comparative importance? Does not the execution of this law deprive the subject of that personal liberty, so dear to mankind and to the wise legislator? And does it not subject the innocent to all the disagreeable circumstances that should only fall on the guilty? It certainly makes the situation of the assaulted worse and of the assailants better, and rather encourages than prevents murder, as it requires less courage to attack unarmed than armed persons."

TO WHICH I ADD AGAIN NOTE MR. JEFFERSON'S OTHER COMMENTS ON ARMS:
No free man shall ever be debarred
the use of arms.

The strongest reason for the
people to retain the right to keep and bear arms
is, as a last resort, to protect themselves
against tyranny in government.

The tree of liberty must be
refreshed from time to time with the blood of
patriots and tyrants
AND, PERHAPS, MOST IMPORTANTLY: President Thomas Jefferson's note on the interpretation of the Constitution: "On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed.

I Was Wrong On Norway!

2011-07-24T08:00:00.002-05:00

I APOLOGIZE! I was wrong on the source of the recent terrorist act in Norway. I operated on a "If it walks like a Muslim terrorists, If it uses bombs like a Muslim terrorist, I it murders children like a Muslim terrorist, it must be such." I did not think and did not think that Norway could produce an Oklahoma City type of monster (May his name be forgotten!).

While all the pathological pacifists, others in a state of "dhimmitude" (Look it up) and the Islamic providers of their usual disinformation use both as an example of "See, Christians do it also!", the ongoing campaign of rape, murder and genocide will be continued by Muslims in The Sudan and most of those crimes throughout the world---As a standard for behavior set by the teachings of Islam and the example of that fellow Mohammed (Himself a murderer, liar and treaty-breaker, bandit and the perverted sexual abuser of a nine-year-young girl-child).

What Is A "Mosque"?

2011-07-21T19:12:00.001-05:00

NER: ‘What is a mosque? Interview with Sam Solomon
Posted on August 1, 2010 by Eeyore
This is an interview quite similar to the one Vlad Tepes did of Mr. Solomon on June 7th of this year. Here is a written transcript of that interview from The New English Review:
What is a Mosque? An Interview with Sam Solomon
by Jerry Gordon (August 2010)

Gordon: Greetings Mr. Solomon and thank you for consenting to this interview. Let us start with the simple question, what is a mosque and what is its basic function in the Muslim community?
Solomon: A mosque, totally unlike a church or a synagogue, serves the function of orchestrating and mandating every aspect of “life” in a Muslim community from the religious, to the political, to the economic, to the social, to the military. In Islam, religion and life are not separate. They are indivisible. In Islam religion is not just a part of life, but “life” is absorbed and regulated to the tiniest detail by religion (See Figure 1). In other words every aspect of a man or woman’s life must be defined and governed by religion. So there is no concept of personal choice whatsoever, or in theological terms, there is no “free will,” but only limited preferences between prescribed courses of action. In addition, there is no concept of a personal relationship between the person and the entity being worshiped, so “worship” itself, is of a different nature than that performed in a church or synagogue.

Figure 1: Comparison of Non-Islamic vs Islamic views of one’s freedom of choice and options in life.So we see that a mosque is a seat of government. A mosque is a school. A mosque is a court. A mosque is a training center. A mosque is a gathering place, or social center. It is not a place of “worship” per se as understood and as practiced in Western societies.
Specifically, how is a mosque a threat to the community within which it is built?
Every single mosque in the world, by definition, is modeled on the mosque of Muhammad in Medina in accordance with the Sunnah. The Sunnah interprets the Qur’an by reporting exhaustively on everything that Muhammad said, did, or consented to. Therefore, his Medina mosque, the first mosque, was a place where he gave judgments, where he decided who would be executed, where he instituted policy—domestic and military— where Jihad war strategies were designed. Consequently, it was a storage place for arms, a military training base, and was where troops were blessed and dispatched. Literally they were sent to conquer – first the whole of Arabia, and then the rest of the known world. Therefore if the present-day mosque is modeled as per the Sunnah of Muhammad then there should be very serious concern. As is well-known, Muslims are required to follow the example (Sunnah) of Muhammad—and according to Sura 33:36 it is not an option or a matter of opinion: “It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.” This explains and establishes beyond doubt why arms have been found in mosques in various countries, and in different capital cities.
In addition to the undisputed significance of the Medina mosque as the role model for all Mosques, there is also the Islamic policy of establishing strategic Mosques as beachheads with interconnected networks. Taken together, these two policies do constitute a clear and present danger—and a need for concern.
For example, when Abu Hamza[1] was the Imam of the Finsbury Park mosque in the United Kingdom, he trained people, he sent out terrorists and British authorities found arms stored there. He was well within his Islamic mandate as these activities were sanctioned by Islam. He didn’t find it wrong because it is in the Islamic manuals. Another prime example of a mosque being found to have engaged in high-level political, military and intelligence activities is the Munich Mosque, which is now considered by Islamists to be on a par with some of highest-ranked Mosques in Muslim countries.[2]
What comment do you have on the significance of the Ground Zero Mosque set to open on 9/11, 2011?
First of all, the sponsors and supporters of the Ground Zero Mosque insist that the significance of the building of this mosque is that it constitutes a refutation of the radical “fringe” within Islam, and as such, is a gesture of peace and reconciliation toward America and the victims of 9/11.
But, it is ludicrous for anybody to accept that this is a gesture of peace in the Western sense—rather it is a different definition of “peace.” It is the Islamic definition of “peace” as a suspension of “struggle” which is ultimately said to emerge once opposition ceases, and Islam reigns supreme as Muhammad has stated, “Islam rises and nothing rises above it.”
The rationale of the sponsors is that acts of terrorism are being carried out by misguided “radicals” rather than true Muslims and that as a consequence, Islam itself has been victimized and defamed and needs to be defended. Their solution is to appear to decry all “radicalism”, and to take the bold symbolic act of erecting a 13 to 15-story Mosque—ostensibly representing true Islam—on the site itself, in their words, to “bridge and heal this divide.” [3]
So, if allowed to be built, this mosque would consolidate, solidify, and embody a fallacious and pernicious interpretation of what really happened at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.[4]
In one fell swoop, it will be a re-writing of American history with American cooperation, and will achieve another major Islamic goal of setting a high profile beachhead at a strategic location in the seat of American economic power.
When you speak of setting a “beachhead,” is building this mosque tactically similar to Muslims building the Al Aqsa Mosque adjacent to the Western Wall in Jerusalem?
Most Westerners do not realize that there are two Mosques on the Temple Mount. One is called Masjid Al-Aqsa, the Mosque of Ascension, and the other is called “Qubbat Al-Sakhra”, the Dome of the Rock.
To provide the groundwork for answering your question more specifically, the basic principle is, that a mosque, totally unlike a church or synagogue, is a “sign” and a “symbol” of the establishment of “authority”—both religious and political—not just a place of worship for its adherents.
A mosque is the symbol of the establishment of an Islamic authority, and an announcement of the beginning of the “rightful restoration” of the land according to Islamic claims that the “whole world is a mosque,” and is echoed in Muhammad’s words, “the whole earth has been declared unto me a mosque.” Therefore it is a matter of “restoring” rather than “claiming” the land to Islam, as any land not in current submission is at virtual war with Islam, and must be brought “back” according to the Qur’anic version of history.
This process of “bringing back” has a name, it is called “Islamisation,” and is implemented progressively though immigrating segregating, gaining rights, and slowly asserting the supremacy of Islam politically, socially and even culturally. So, yes, the Ground Zero Mosque would be a beachhead—and an important one, but it is not exactly the same as in the case of the Al Aqsa Mosque.
The building of the Al Aqsa Mosque adjacent to the Western Wall was a necessary consolidation of prior Qur’anic claims to the Holy Land and the spiritual base of Judeo-Christian Monotheism,[5] whereas the building of the Ground Zero Mosque would be more in line with the tactical aspect of spreading the base. (See footnote 3)
Having said that, some “beachhead” mosques are more strategic than others. As we have seen earlier the Munich Mosque became the most influential of those built outside Muslim lands prior to the proposed Ground Zero Mosque.
If built, the Ground Zero Mosque will be the most influential sign and symbol of Islamic authority in the Western World.

t thing for us to know about Islam?
>The most important thing for a non-Muslim to understand about Islam is that Islam is not simply a religion. Islam is a social and political system, an indivisible melding of religion and state.
It is a socio-political, socio-religious, socio-economical, socio-educational, socio-judiciary, legislative militaristic system cloaked and garbed in religious terminology.
We must never forget that Islam is an all-encompassing ideological system, and as such wherever there is a Muslim community there will be Sharia and wherever there is a Sharia there is an Islamisation of the territory and ultimately of the nation.

Obama Has "Done Things"!

2011-07-19T20:26:00.005-05:00

Some persons have accused Mr. B. H. Obama of doing nothing while President of the United States except continue to "campaign". THAT IS FALSE! He and his Administration have, as far as I can tell, worked mightily towards their goals through the following affirmative deeds.

1. He alienated some of our best allies (eg The UK, Poland, The Czech Republic and, most specially, Israel) by a combination of insults and betrayals including declaring Israel a "terrorist nation".
2. He has most specially attacked those in our nation most able to create new and permanent jobs (ie The small business owners) by imposing tax-like masses of administrative rules-and-regulations, plus an impending and impossible like burden
if and when "Obamacare" goes into effect.
3. He has done all possible to reduce the "free exercise of religion", but only by Christians, and has done all possible to poof-up Islam (An ideology which is based on, among other things, a perpetual declaration of war against all "unbelievers" as a direct command from its Allah). This includes an "opening up to the Muslim Brotherhood" whose goals and means are, in every way, opposed to that favored by the great majority of US citizens.
4. His Administration has, most specially, attacked the best staff of the CIA (ie Those whose successes are not reported) and exposed them to unwarranted prosecution.
5. Even more than prior presidents, he has refused to secure the Southern borders of the USA against drug smugglers, Mexican based "hit squads" and "kidnapping details", drug lord aided Middle-Eastern terrorists, job thieves---And very much lied about this matter.
6. His agents have facilitated the arming of Mexican drug gangs, against the advise of front line BATF agents and honest-and-protesting American gun dealers,
7. He has weakened the credit of the USA by enabling the spending of trillions of dollars more than the income of our nations (Weakened, in part, by his above-noted anti-job tactics).
8. However, he has proved he is an "honest politician" (ie He stayed bought) by his loyalty to: Job-destroying and budget-busting public and private unions; Other supporters of illegal immigration; That small "Gay" minority in the USA; Such traitors as "Bill" Ayers; Others of the same and anti-American purposes; And, others of the same ilk.
9. He as over-extended the Armed Forces of the USAs in useless military operations, thus aiding the ememies of our nation.

IN FACT, IT APPEARS THAT, WITH VERY FEW EXCEPTIONS, HIS EVERY OFFICIAL ACT HAS WEAKENED THE USA IN THE FACE OF ITS ENEMIES, EXTERNAL-AND-INTERNAL

Quo usque tandem abutere Obama, patientia nostra? Quam diu etiam furor iste tuus nos eludet? Quem ad finem sese effrenata iactabit audacia?[Paraphrased from Cicero's orations against the traitor Catiline.]

I, Me, Myself As Racist?

2011-07-18T14:35:00.004-05:00

Due to some of my comments about Mr. B. H. Obama, Al (The Liar)Sharpton, Jessie (The Extortionist) Jackson I have been accused of being an anti-Black racist against them. If, and only if, there was a hint of racism on my part, it would be against other blacks for the self-slavery to those persons who are "professional Blacks" making a living or sustaining their power by the ongoing stirring up of what remains of inter-racial mistrust in the USA.

Whatever remained of my youthful racism (If any) has been erased by such persons as Walter Mitchell, Professor Thomas Sowell, Congressman (Ex-soldier) Alan West and Herman Cain (Who I support in his campaign for the Presidency) who happen to be Black, but are true professionals and gentlemen.

[In the case the goat-loving Muslim who comments on my column makes his cowardly comments on this one, I remind all that: Being a Muslim is NOT a matter of race; The false prophet Mohammed called blacks "raisin heads"; And, in the classical Arabic of that critter, the same word is used for slave as for a Black person.]

Wisconsin's Unconstitutional CCW Law

2011-07-14T20:22:00.006-05:00

The new Wisconsin CCW Law (1) and related legislation violates my constitutional (Article-I, Section-25, The Constitution of Wisconsin) in a variety of ways, of which the following are only some of those limits.
A. I cannot step off my property (2) without being within 1000-feet of a school and, therefore, am restricted from bearing arms on a capricious and arbitrary basis. The density of schools in my and other urban areas makes the exercise of that rule impossible in practicable terms and discriminates against me and others because we are urban dwellers.
(This is also against the public policy which supports the conservation of gasoline; I note hat I purchased my home before the "1000-foot rule" was placed into law.)
B. Declaring rifles and shotguns, for the purposes of this act, as "not guns" is a violation against reason, is arbitrary-and-capricious, and is unenforceable
C. That CCW law requires me to pay a fee to exercise a constitutional right. As the charging of such fees (eg "Poll Taxes") are, by extension of the Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution and relevant court decisions (3) are patently unconstitutional.
D. The requirement for "training" may be an equal, parallel, violation of law as: Most such training programs assess a fee/charge; And, if any written test is required, a violation of equal rights parallel to those mis-used by some jurisdictions to limit voting (4).
E. As I (And many others) have physical problems limiting my (Our) ability to walk
down-and-up steps (eg At gun shops where "training" is often given) or for extended distances (eg At out-of-door gun-clubs/ranges offering like training), the imposition a training requirement may be a violation of the "Americans With Disabilities Act" (5) and may expose the State of Wisconsin to damages for enforcing that provision.
F. Charging a fee for a "fingerprint/record check" is parallel to the those noted above; This especially in light of the fact that purchasing a firearm already requires a fee-based check (Which I recently paid in the process of buying a firearm) and that the permit-issuing authority (Or any law enforcement agency can easily use existing electronic resources to check for prior felony convictions, current court orders which might limit CCW or like pending cases.(Also, a simple, but sworn-to, statement that there are no legal bars to CCW would legally suffice as the penalties for "False Swearing" are severe.)
G.. The conversion of local public libraries (Apparently already done) and public university grounds-and-buildings into "gun fee zones" makes them into "free fire zones" for criminals and "crazies" which: Provides those anti-social persons with unequal protection of the laws above those of other citizens; And, most certainly, should not be public policy (6).
I. Finally, there is nothing in Article-I, Section-25 which allows the Legislature (Or, the Courts) to put limits on the right to bear arms for the lawful purposes contained in that Amendment (7).

I also note the following:
I. I most certainly hope that the Legislature had the foresight to include some clause in the noted legislation which would prevent the entire Act from being declared unconstitutional if one-or-more parts-or-sections of it are so ruled.
II. If not, the Legislature must pass corrective legislation in the immediate future.
III. If, and only if, any CCW permit is required, there is no rational reason for it to cost more than the ID-card now issued by Wisconsin's Department of Transportation; An agency which is set-up to issue such cards and should be delegated that job (The CCW card to show citizenship and "double" as a voter-ID card and general ID as is the current DOT card).
IV. Is the State of Wisconsin willing to throw away money defending that unconstitutional Act?

NOTES
(1) http (colon)//legis (dot)wisconsin (dot) gov/publications/im/M2011_pdf
(2) Post: Curtilage--So You Do Not Have To Look It Up
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2011/06/curtilage-so-you-do-not-have-to-look-it.html
(3) http (colon) en (dot)wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Twenty-fourth_Amendment-to-the_United_States-Constitution
(4) http(colon)en(dot)en(dot)wikipedia(dot)org/wiki/Literacy_test
(5) http(colon)//www(dot)ada(dot)gov
(6) Post: Why Did So Many Students Die?
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2008/03/why-did-so-many-students-die-at.html
(7) Wisconsin Constitution Article I, Section 25
"The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose."

After Shooting Someone In Self-Defense

2011-07-12T07:19:00.002-05:00

WITH THE PASSAGE OF A CCW LAW IN WISCONSIN, THOSE WHO "CARRY" AND ARE FORCED TO USE A GUN (OR OTHER WEAPON) IN SELF-DEFENSE SHOULD BE AWARE OF THIS ARTICLE.

THE BEST ARTICLE OF 2008..
After The Shooting
"...there are some things that you need to remember..."
by Larry Correia
As self-defense oriented people, we tend to think about the actual encounter a lot, and seldom, if ever, about what we should do in the aftermath. If you are unlucky enough to be involved in a violent encounter, there are some things that you need to remember to maximize your chances of a successful outcome.

Call for help immediately. Even if you produced the gun and your assailant retreated with no shots fired, call the police. If there is somebody out there worth pulling a gun on, then the cops need to know about it. They may have just gone around the corner to pick an easier victim.

As soon as it is safe for you to do so, call 911. Always ask for an ambulance. If somebody has been shot, whether injured or even if you are a hundred percent sure that they are dead, I still want you to ask for medical attention. First off, killing people sucks, so if I've got an injured assailant, I don't want him to die, I just wanted to make him leave me alone. Second, if you don't ask for medical attention, then there is a good chance that fact will be brought up during any potential trial. Basically it is just another tool of a prosecutor trying to portray the permit holder as a blood-thirsty vigilante.

If humanly possible, have your weapon secured before the police arrive, at least in your holster, but definitely not in your hand. The responding officers do not know you, and the information they got from dispatch was probably sketchy at best. The last thing you want to do is survive a violent encounter only to get shot by the cops because they think you're the bad guy.

If you are ever in a situation where you still have the gun in your hands, and the police arrive, they are going to order you to drop the gun. Comply with their instructions because otherwise they may think you are the threat and very well may shoot you. Do not start talking or trying to explain what is going on. Don't be offended because they are treating you like the bad guy. This is not the time to get indignant. This is the time to keep from getting shot.

If you have medical training, and you have just shot and injured an attacker, you may be tempted to administer first aid. Keep in mind, however, that a minute ago this person was trying to hurt you bad enough that they were worth shooting. That threat may still be a threat. Your primary advantage is the fact that you have a firearm. If you then put yourself close enough to administer treatment, you are giving up that advantage. He may not be as incapacitated as you thought, and when he wakes up and sees the person who just shot him within arm's length, you have a real good chance of getting your head twisted off your shoulders. He may have a folding knife that you won't know about until it cuts your kidney in half.

Keep in mind that when the police shoot somebody, the paramedics do not rush in and give immediate aid. The police always secure the individual before the paramedics move in. That is for everyone's safety. If you have been through first responder training, keep in mind one of the very first examples that was given to your class. If you come across a car accident, and the car is on fire, you do not have to climb into the burning car to try and help, because now you are just one more injured person to treat. You never want to endanger yourself to administer aid.

Never tamper with the crime scene. You may have heard the old myth, usually given by an imbecile that does not understand self-defense law, "if you shoot the guy on the porch, drag him in the living room." Bad idea. Do not ever do that. Once you shoot someone, wherever it happened is now a crime scene. If you tamper with the evidence, the authorities will figure it out, and this will now create doubt in the minds of the reasonable people looking at your case. If you felt the need to tamper with the scene, they will believe that you are trying to hide something. The only thing you may do is to make the area physically safe for yourself, but other than that, leave it alone.

On that same note, do not flee the scene. Your personal safety comes first, so if you need to get away to keep from being injured, that is one thing, but make sure that you then call the police as quickly as possible. If you flee the scene of a shooting, that once again raises the specter of guilt with the authorities, and that will color their investigation accordingly.

The responding officers are going to question you. I want you to give a brief statement, and then shut up, accent on brief, with little or no details. As in, "Officer, he attacked me, I was in fear for my life, so I shot him." That is it. Do not start to babble to the police. Do not try to explain everything at the time. They will continue to question you. At that point you will politely tell them that you are not going to answer any more questions until you have your attorney present.

When you shoot somebody, unless you have ice water in your veins, you will be going through various stress reactions. Some of you may be in shock, others will be distraught that they just took a life, others may be enraged that some bad guy just threatened their children, but whatever your reaction, you will not be in a calm state of mind. It is a medical fact that adrenalin affects our higher brain functions. You will tend to forget details, some of which may be very important, or even worse, your brain will fill in the forgotten blanks with facts that will later be shown to be incorrect.

Wait until you have an attorney present before you make your complete statement. This gives you the time to compose yourself and calm down. Also, the Bill of Rights gives us the right to legal counsel. Take advantage of it. A good attorney will keep you from saying anything stupid that will be used against you in court later.

Now some of you may not like this. You may have the mistaken belief that it is the bad guys that need the defense attorneys, not us good guys. Unfortunately that is not how it works in real life. We work in an adversarial system, and anything you say during a statement, can and will be used against you in a court of law.

These are just a few basic tips to keep in mind. Your primary consideration in a violent encounter is to first survive the attack, but doing these things may help you survive the aftermath.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

-Larry Correia is an author, firearms instructor, and one of the owners of Fuzzy Bunny Movie Guns in Draper, Utah. FBMG is a gun store, specializing in self-defense needs, training, and full-line smithing. Their online store is at www.fbmginc.com The author can be reached at larry@fbmginc.com

Marriage, Democracy And Like Subjects

2011-07-03T12:35:00.004-05:00

I continue to be both amazed and distressed at the too many people who will not accept the democratically expressed will of the People as to, in this case, the support of the traditional definition-of and laws-regarding "marriage". This includes Mr. B. H. Obama as to the "Defense Of Marriage Act" (DOMA), as enacted by our Congress, AND, columnist Sherry Schultz ("No liberty and justice for all in Wisconsin"; Milwaukee Journal Sentinel; July 2, 2011; Page-4J) as to the direct will of the People in enacting an amendment to our Constitution defining marriage and limiting certain benefits to persons in that state. The same and democratic decision was not accepted by the minority in California where a like proposal has been appealed to some judge on the left-coast.

There are those who claim that allowing same-sex "marriages" will lead to demands that multi-partner like relationships to be allowed under law. From hardly noticeD news items, there have been such moves in other places.

If this continues, our only question may be: "WHAT IS THE AGE-OF-CONSENT FOR A SHEEP?".

Dane County Courts VS Democracy

2011-06-30T12:51:00.003-05:00

There have been, at least, two Dane County Circuit Court decisions halting the enforcement of our "collective bargaining law"---The last being by Judge Maryann Summi. More recently, another Dane County Circuit Court judge has attempted to nullify the State Constitution's provision defining marriage and forbidding allowing marriage related benefits to "other" couples.

. This again raises this question: Why do the citizens of Dane County (Especially Madison, that "X square miles surrounded by reality") have the unequal power to elect those judges who have the "first shot" at challenging the acts of our Legislature, whose members are elected from all of Wisconsin's counties, and the Administrative Rules of the Executive Branch of our government, headed by a governor elected by all the voters of this State?

Again, this appears to very much be an unequal protection of the law, one acting against the People outside of Dane County.

Again, I suggest randomly selected from all of Wisconsin's Circuit Courts, three judge panels (No two judges from the same Court Of Appeals district), to make decisions on all such challenges to State Acts. With today's teleconferences and like communications, this should not be a problem. Appeals from those panels would go, if accepted, directly to the State Supreme Court.

In fact, it is well-past-the-time when the Legislature should enforce equal rights to those citizens, outside of Dane County, as to judicial reviews of the acts of that Legislature and of our various Administrative Rule making agencies.

Jury Instruction VS Too Complex Laws

2011-06-27T19:29:00.006-05:00

Many of our laws (Most specially as to tax-codes, business laws, "green" laws and such like creations of those lawyers lurking in legislative bodies and administrative agencies). "Common sense", as a requirement for citizens who generally wish to obey our laws, has become most uncommon.

As for criminal court (Or other prosecutions) which may result in jail/prison terms or crippling fines, I suggest that the following be the first "jury instruction" given and the first rule for trials without juries or for Administrative Hearing Examiners or tribunals.

(This is written for jury instructions in criminal cases. Like positions should be posited for non-jury trials and administrative hearings.)

"The jury is first to consider if the law in question is one that can be understood by the ordinary citizen, with an average education and without prior consultation with an attorney or other like specialist. If the Jury finds the answer to be "no", it (They) must acquit without further consideration of any facts or other instructions of the Court. The jury must not consider any "should have known" position unless the defendant was proven to be an expert in the applicable part of the Law. If, and only if, the answer is "yes", then they may proceed to the consideration of the other facts and law pertaining to this case/matter."

It is very likely that such an instruction will not be automatically considered by the Court and may, very likely, be rejected by judges. Yet, proposing it and having it rejected offers a wide door for appeals of any convictions.

You may wish to refer to: Silverglate, Harvey A.; "Three Felonies A Day---How the Feds Target the Innocent"; Encounter Books; New York & London; 2009.

The Dark Side Of Compromise

2011-06-26T07:55:00.002-05:00

Mr. David M. Shribman (Executive Editor, the "Pittsburgh Post-Gazette") has touted the benefits of compromise in our national-political life ("Loss of compromise is a threat to nation"; "Milwaukee Journal Sentinel"; June 26, 2011; Page- 1J). I suspect that he has put aside his history books some years ago and has forgotten the very "dark side" of compromise.

During the formation of this nation we executed a probably necessary compromise as to counting slaves to determine States' representation in the Congress. During the 1850s the USA compromised further on the question of slavery. The results of such compromises were: A delay in the abolishing of slavery; The bloodiest war fought by the American People; And, an anti-democracy movement from "these United States" to "the United States".

In the 1930s the United Kingdom and most European nations compromised with Adolf Hitler when a firm "NO!", a few French soldiers and, perhaps, a few rifle shots would have stopped his expansion-of-power into the Saar and throughout Europe. The results of that compromise was many millions of dead and the physical-and-other exhaustion of the USA and other nations.

By "reaching out" and "dialog" the Churches, European nations and the USA are attempting to compromise with a newly resurgent Islam (Which seeks its perpetual goals by traditional means). The results are: Multiple wars in the Middle East; Asymmetrical war with Muslims throughout the world ;Weekly reports of small group or individual, military-style, Jihad everywhere; And severe threats to democracy and public safety in every jurisdiction where Muslims form more that a minute part of the local population.

Within the Congress compromise with morality and financial sanity have yielded a multi-trillion dollar debt, spending well beyond revenues, a great danger to the security of the nation as well as an ongoing roll-call of corruption and anti-democracy arrogance from the White House down to local elected officials.

Compromise with the examples of history will condemn us to repeat the most horrid lessons of history (Paraphrased from George Santayana).

Treason & Support Of Islam

2011-06-24T17:27:00.005-05:00

UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE-III

Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.
“ Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely "levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby a variety of crimes, including conspiring to kill the King or "violating" the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that "there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war."[13]

Under English law effective during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, there were essentially five species of treason.[citation needed] Of the five, the Constitution adopted only two: levying war and adhering to enemies. Omitted were species of treason involving encompassing (or imagining) the death of the king, certain types of counterfeiting, and finally fornication with women in the royal family of the sort which could call into question the parentage of successors. James Wilson wrote the original draft of this section, and he was involved as a defense attorney for some accused of treason against the Patriot cause.

Section 3 also requires the testimony of two different witnesses on the same overt act, or a confession by the accused in open court, to convict for treason. This rule was derived from an older English statute, the Treason Act 1695. In Cramer v. United States, 325 U.S. 1 (1945), the Supreme Court ruled that "[e]very act, movement, deed, and word of the defendant charged to constitute treason must be supported by the testimony of two witnesses."[14] In Haupt v. United States, 330 U.S. 631 (1947), however, the Supreme Court found that two witnesses are not required to prove intent; nor are two witnesses required to prove that an overt act is treasonable. The two witnesses, according to the decision, are required to prove only that the overt act occurred (eyewitnesses and federal agents investigating the crime, for example).
==================================================================================

To me it would seem that such persons as Major Nidal Hasan (Of Fort Hood infamy), those members of the "Fort Dix Six" who were US Citizens. the ex-Marine recently charged with shooting at the Pentagon, the other two and West Coast Muslims recently arrested before they could execute an armed attack on a military installation were all waging war against the USA or planning to do so. But, they were not so charged nor is it likely that the newer cases will result in that object-lesson and most horrid of crimes.

Why? Could it be that Muslims have become "more equal than others" (Like the pigs in "Animal Farm)? Or, could it be that active prosecution of treason cases would place at risk so many editors, publishers, politicians, professors and such persons.
===================================================================================
More specially, I note that it has been clearly demonstrated-and-proved that most contributions to "islamic charities" end up in the hands of terrorists who are, also in fact, involved in active military "jihad" against the Armed Forces of the USA. Such actions meet the requirements of the Constitution and above-reported court case to warrant charges-of and convictions-for treason.

Constitutional Amendment Regarding Lawyers & Congress

2011-06-18T16:12:00.003-05:00

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT REGARDING LAWYERS & THE CONGRESS

Section-I: No person who has ever graduated from a school-of-law or has practiced law shall be seated as a Member of the Congress of the United States.

Section-II: Nothing in the Constitution of the United States or in its laws shall prohibit the People of the Several States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or of the Territories of the United States from enacting like measures as to the Members of their Legislatures.

Section-III: This Amendment shall take effect five-years after ratification.

========================================================================
NOTE BENE: As lawyers already control the Courts in our national government (And that of the Several States and territories or possessions of the USA) and are well on their way to control the various agencies as make up the Administrative branch of our government(s), it would be well to have one branch free of them. Why?

Attorneys generate laws which are so complex as to insure the full employment of other attorneys (And themselves if removed from office). This complexity leaves the USA in a handicapped place to such economic power-houses, who lack a large lawyer-class, as Japan, Korea, India and the “Peoples Republic” of China.

For the individual citizen or business-owner, the complexity of laws leaves them open to many penalties (Including prison “time”) if they fail to comply with even the smallest detail of some law or Administrative Rule.

“Ignorance of the Law is no excuse—For violating any law” was a sound maxim, when laws (And administrative-rules) were few, written in English and could be known and understood by most citizens with no more than a high-school education. That is no longer the case.

Of course, we could follow William Shakespeare's recommendation (Henry VI, Part-2, Act-4, scene-1) where Dick-The-Butcher states, “The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers”. (I would excuse my lawyer who I like!)

Curtilage--So You Do Not Have To Look It Up

2011-06-15T16:25:00.002-05:00

The curtilage is an important legal term to define the land immediately surrounding a house or dwelling, including any closely associated buildings and structures, but excluding any associated 'open fields beyond'. It defines the boundary within which a home owner can have a reasonable expectation of privacy and where 'intimate home activities' take place. It is an important legal concept in some jurisdictions for the understanding of burglary, trespass, and in relation to planning controls.

In urban properties the location of the curtilage may be evident from the position of fences, wall and similar; within larger properties it may be a matter of some legal debate as to where the private area ends and the 'open fields' start.[1]
Contents
[hide]

Curtilage in United States law

This distinction is important in United States law for cases dealing with burglary and with self-defense under the "Castle Doctrine." In some state law, such as Florida, burglary encompasses the English common law definition and adds (among other things) curtilage to the protected area of the dwelling into which intrusion is prohibited. Similarly, under Florida's Castle Doctrine a home-owner does not have to retreat within the curtilage.

The boundary between the home and the curtilage that surrounds it, on the one hand, and the open fields beyond the curtilage, on the other, is also important for the application of the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment applies only to the "home," which courts have construed to include the area immediately surrounding the house in which the intimate home activities occur, but not to the open fields beyond. The requirement that law enforcement officers obtain a warrant before searching a suspect's home extends, therefore, to the curtilage, but not to private property beyond the curtilage, even if their access to such "open fields" without the owner's permission would constitute a trespass. [2]

In United States v. Dunn, the Supreme Court identified four factors as critical when assessing the limits of curtilage: "the proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home, whether the area is included wit

Reinstate The Poll Tax!!!

2011-06-12T21:31:00.002-05:00

TO MY ELECTED STATE OFFICIALS:

With the "underclass" getting more-and-more out-of-hand and increasing demands on the budgets of our state and local governments (eg Provision of Voter ID Cards for the poor; Costs associated with "punish the voters" recounts), we must find a way to pay for (At the least) such spending of public funds. THEREFORE, we should reinstate the "Poll Tax!

I suggest that the State charge about $30,00 every five-years PLUS the costs of an annual finger-print check (To minimize voting by convicted felons).

Ah, but naysayers will claim that voting (Unlike, for example, legally operating a motor vehicle) is a "constitutional right" AND that poll taxes (Along with ambiguous pre-voting testing of citizens wishing to execute the right to vote) has (have) soundly been declared as truly and fully unconstitutional by the Courts.

This is NOT a problem as the Wisconsin Legislature is intent on imposing like and unconstitutional charges and requirements against citizens who wish to execute the
parallel right (Please see the very broad AND unrestricted Article-1, Section-25 of Wisconsin's Constitution).

I have little doubt that someone will, upon being charges with any CCW under the proposed law, will successfully challenge it on such grounds as were successful in putting-down the Poll Tax and examination pre-conditions.

ARE YOU ASKING FOR TROUBLE?

Jim Crow VS Jaime Cuervo

2011-06-12T11:46:00.001-05:00

I doubt me that it is any desire to return to "Jim Crow" in the USA which is driving the push for "Voter ID". I suggest that it is a understanding of a "clear and present danger" to the sanctity of the vote which moves the People towards an anti "Jaime Cuervo" position.

Guns & President Jefferson

2011-06-08T08:13:00.002-05:00

The Other Thomas Jefferson Quotes
Much, too much, has been made of the PRIVATE letter of Thomas Jefferson as to the "wall between church and state". Perhaps all should not the following, OTHER, quotes from that founder's statements.

No free man shall ever be debarred
the use of arms.

The strongest reason for the
people to retain the right to keep and bear arms
is, as a last resort, to protect themselves
against tyranny in government.

The tree of liberty must be
refreshed from time to time with the blood of
patriots and tyrants.

. President Thomas Jefferson's note on the interpretation of the Constitution: "On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed.

Exclusion From The House Of Representatives

2011-06-07T20:58:00.004-05:00

In 1919 AD the House Of Representatives refused to “seat” Congressman Elect Victor Berger of Wisconsin's Seventh District apparently because: Mr. Berger was honestly an honest Socialist (Of the variety called “Sewer Socialists” who were much more interested in protecting the health and well being of the People than in an “theoretical” socialism); And, in response to violent acts by union members and socialists in other parts of the USA, which had little, if anything, to do with Mr. Berger.

My recollection of contemporary press reports were the considerable number of claims that allowing
Socialists a role in government would result in: Murder and mass-murder in the streets; The disease of “free love” being rampant throughout the nation; The sexual abuse of little girls; Overthrown of our democratic systems of laws and government; Destruction of the Middle Class in this nation, that part of our population seen as the bulwark of our land; And, of everything which makes Western Civilization the mainstay of our world.

The not-seating of Mr. Berger did not appear to stop “free love”, murder and serial mass-murder and various forms of sexual abuse of children. Our subsequent, especially of late, Administrations have made considerable progress in abolishing the Middle Class and weakening those standards and institutions which support Western Civilization.

Strangely enough, the Congress has seated two persons who subscribe to a 1400-plus year old, medieval, criminal-terrorist ideology-or-movement which does, in fact, use murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, perpetual-and-violent military-level actions (ie “Declared War), lying and organized theft and lying to accomplish its very anti-democracy goals being: The destruction or near suppression of all ideologies other than itself and of all religions; Rule of all nations by only Muslims; Replacement of all legal systems other than Sharia; Subjection of all women and all non-Muslims to the will of male Muslim; And, the other horrors of that Nazi like movement

The 1919 Congress saw even Mr. Berger's brand of Socialism as a clear-and-present danger, That position might, without “20/20 hindsight”, be considered not unreasonable considering the concurrent and bloody revolutions occurring in such newsworthy places as Russia and Germany. Even without that “clarity of vision” as demonstrated by such leftists as Adolph Hitler, J. I. Stalin, Mao and others of that ilk.

It appears that the case of "Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 486 (1969) would probably prevent such removal today. However, as the Supreme Court no longer holds fast to the rulings of prior courts, I could be wrong.

With our much better knowledge of history (If we use it as, to paraphrase: “Those who do not study history, learn from history and apply those lessons will be condemned to repeat its worst lessons”) and what should be our better knowledge of the goals-and-means of Islam, we should wonder at why the current Congress and those of future terms should seat any Muslims---Who do not, publicly and fully, deny those horrid and perpetual Islamic goals and means.

PS----CETERUM CENSEO MECCA ESSE DELENDAM /Cato Novo

Tower Of Power

2011-06-07T07:50:00.002-05:00

There have been many recommendations as to reducing the “carbon footprint” left by the use of coal and petroleum products, especially as to the generation of electrical power. Some of these proposals are: Nuclear fission plants (What to do with the radio-active waste products?); Wind driven turbines (Apparently OK except off the shores of Senator Kennedy's estate; But, otherwise limited in other locations by terrain, average wind flow, bird migration patterns, etc.); Geo-Thermal “heat wells” (Drilled at a very high cost and requiring water supplies often not readily available in the proper geological areas); Solar reflector arrays with photo-electric cells (VERY expensive) or closed circuit hot fluid-to-steam turbines (One of the better ideas, but dependent on sunshine-per-year amounts and availability of vast spaces); And, some others I cannot recall.

Yet, there is one proposal about which little has been written or, as far as I can tell, considered. That is the use (Especially in desert areas) of a “tower of power”, being a very tall (1000') chimney (As used in many coal fired electric power plants or ore refining facilities; Some still existing without current use), having about it four-to-ten air intakes above the ground effect level (20'-plus), using the heat rising effect to draw in air from the surrounding area and passing it through moderate-to-slow turbines at each such intake or one large, multi-stage, turbine in the stack, all to generate electrical power.

By experiment, gates could be installed to open in the eye of any wind to increase air flow.

I suspect that this type of devise would work best in the hot and dry environment of a desert (eg Southern California, Arizona, parts of Australia, Israel) where the power produced would vary as the day's heat (Which would assist in providing power during the high-demand, air-conditioning, parts of the day).

Of course, we might “go to the source” and erect such a tower over the Capitol Building in Washington (DC), EU headquarters, the UN (Useless Nations) HQ AND, of course, so many academic buildings.

Defining Islam---Again

2011-06-01T12:30:00.003-05:00

Crusader Quotes & Latin Tags

2011-05-19T20:27:00.000-05:00

CRUSADER QUOTES
AND
VARIOUS “TAGS”

Tues-les tous, Dieu Redonnatdea les sein! (Norman French: Allegedly advise given by a Abbot to Simon III de Monfort when Simon noted that the heritics-in-question were hiding among other who looked and dressess as orthodox Catholics.)
Caedite eos, Nevit enim Dominus qui sunt elus!
Kill them all, God will know which are His!
Kill them all, God will sort them out! (Viet Nam War usage)

=================================================================

Mecca Delenda Est!
Mecca must be destroyed!

Carthago delenda est (English: "Carthage must be destroyed") or the fuller Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam or also Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam (English: "Furthermore, I think Carthage must be destroyed")

PS----CETERUM CENSEO MECCA ESSE DELENDAM

=======================================================================
Deus Vult!
Deus lo Vult!
God wills it!

Habemus Gladii Duo!
We have two swords!
(See Luke22:35-38)

De Laude Novae Militae
In praise of the new troops/military-order

Si Vis Pachem Para Bellum!
If you wish peace, prepare for war!

Mihi persuasum est odisse acerbe.
I am a believer in tough hate.

Justtitia suum cuique distribuit
Justice renders to everyone what is due him.

Bonis nocet quiquis pepercerit malis.
In all things, whoever spares the bad injures the good.

Of Vigilantes, Peoples Courts, ETC

2011-05-19T18:59:00.004-05:00

From time-to-time in such diverse places as the banks off the Mississippi River (Cannibal river pirates), Gold Rush California, 1956 Hungary, the Highlands of Scotland the normal processes of law have been ignored to put-down gross criminality. In some cases the "authorities" were unable, and too often unwilling, to safeguard the innocent.

In some places citizens would take time-off from providing for the support of themselves and their families and would form up "Committees Of Vigilance" (ie Vigilantes) which would inquired into crimes, acting as police and courts, and "execute" justice, if not law' on criminals.

In some revolutionary times, citizens would bring alleged offenders to "People's Courts" which had some semblance of traditional law----Without the nit-picking of lawyers.

I do not maintain that the above two examples protected the "rights" of (Accused) criminals, but they did safeguard that minimum of ORDER as is needed before there can be LAW or the hope for JUSTICE.

In the USA of today, the lawful authorities have NOT maintained order or law along most of our Southern border. Those authorities have failed to use the civil police, the military and even the "Organized Militia" (Which is NOT the "National Guard"!) to maintain minimum order. It may be that is now the duty AND right of the unorganized militia (Being all citizens capable of bearing arms and self-armed), "Committees Of Vigilance" and "Peoples Courts" to maintain order AND safeguard-the-innocent.

The governments of Egypt, the Sudan, "Palestine" and other "nations" with Muslim majority national or local (eg France, Sweden and Dearborn, Michigan) are unable or unwilling to protect non-Muslims from Islamic attacks. Certainly the forces deployed by the UN and African Union have not been able to stop such attacks.

MORE AND MORE THE USA IS SEEING AGGRESSIVE AND VIOLENT ACTS BY MUSLIMS AGAINST THOSE WHO INSIST THAT THE LAWS OF THIS REPUBLIC, THE SEVERAL STATES AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS BE OBEYED.

In fact, some might rightly claim that the Crusaders were such loosely organized and effective bodies of armed men, outside of the authority of civil rulers, who acted to protect the innocent and punish evil-doers. Although they were not successful in the Near East, that crusader spirit was key to the turning back of Islamic aggression in other places AND TO THE PRESERVATION OF CIVILIZATION.

I can think of some persons in the USA who might well be subjected to the authority of "Committees Of Vigilance" and "Peoples Courts"

Wisconsin's "Dead Letter Laws"

2011-05-19T08:55:00.002-05:00

Some have stated that Wisconsin's unenforced laws should be removed from our list of criminal offenses. The classic case is "Adultery" where full prosecution of offenders would likely leave us a State without enough people "on the outside" (Of prisons and jails) to take care of those "on the inside". (As a one time Wisconsin Probation & Parole Agent", I can remember a couple who were convicted of that offense), The classic, recent, example of such a criminal is Milwaukee's police chief and his self-admitted adultery.

However, it is a matter for the People's elected legislators to remove such statutes.

At one time Wisconsin had such crimes as "Bank Burglary" (Which allowed a life sentence!), "Rape", "Theft Of Livestock", "Sexual Intercourse With A Child". These were rewritten under different titles or otherwise removed from our stature books---By the Legislature.

I also note that "Treason" (ie Waging war against the State of Wisconsin) remains on our statute book (s.946.01) although as far as I know, there has never been a prosecution for that offense ( Although some of the mob which recently attacked our State Capitol building could be construed as having violated that law; The statutory required acts, as exhibited by the noted mob members, went well beyond the protection for "free speech").

For that matter, I suggest that the Legislature add some sort of "Violation Of Civil Rights Under Color Of Law" which would go beyond the current "Misconduct In Public Office" towards protecting the rights of the People.

Bonis nocet quiquis pepercerit malis.

Sadness RE: The Church Ignoring Truth

2011-05-17T17:41:00.003-05:00

I was saddened by such headlines as "Islamic Scholars Bash Benedict". It is not that I was surprised by such a reaction as Muslims, scholars and clerics more than most, react to any criticism of Islam as an actual attack or "bashing". Such are not interested in truth, but only in forwarding the goals of that ideology which, by the way, include the effective destruction of the Church.

What truly saddens me is the limp-wristed, cowardly and delusional responses of the last series of Popes, the Holy See, so many bishops (Especially in the Eastern Churches), editors-and-publishers of "Catholic" publications and too many others. All of such persons continue to physically-and-spiritually endanger all Catholics, all Christians, Jews (Our spiritual ancestors) and everyone who is not Muslim.

I suggest that we need such popes (And Church supporters) as Urban II (First Crusade), Innocent XI (Turning back the Muslim Turks at Vienna) and St. Pius V (Battle of Lepanto).

Most of all we need to apply the teachings of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, a "Doctor Of The Church", who taught us how to properly, ethically and morally "strike blows for Christ". Today's Church seems unable to strike those blows even with the sword-of-truth by declaring: The true nature of Islam by listing its horrid goals and even more horrid means;That Islam regresses to its most medieval modes as its population, in any place, increases; And, that true-believing Muslims are, like pirates, the enemies of all humans.

Of course, words did not and will not protect the Christian and Pagan peoples of the Sudan from the Janjaweed and other Muslim agents of Islamic state terrorism (I am redundant here). Contracting with "Blackwater" or some like security company would have done those victims much more good. A heartfelt shout, from the Vatican, of DEUS VULT! appears to be needed!

I was asked by a regular Catholic columnist, "Are you trying to start a war with over a Billion Muslims?". The fact is that we have been at war with Islam since its inventor declared it to be perpetual until all are under the rule of Muslims and Sharia or have accepted the slave-like status of "dhimitude". That state-of-war continues to this day and for the future without regard of the views expressed by the Holy See, and all those intellectual cowards-and-liars noted in the first paragraph of this letter AND secular persons.

Now, WHO willwar declare the truth that the Pope and those others named above are unwilling to speak or write?

Other Notes On Weapons & Citizens

2011-05-16T12:09:00.001-05:00

Best Book: Second Amendment & Bill Of Rights
Halbrook, Stephen P. (Ll.D.);
The Founders' second Amendment: Origins Of The Right To Bear Arms;
Ivan R. Dee (Publisher), In Association With The Independent Institute;
Chicago, 2008
The above cited book is excellent for the following reasons:
1. It provides a deep and well documented (Original documents) review of the development of the Second Amendment to our Constitution and, more generally, of the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution;
2. The author presents both sides of each argument before and during the Revolution and during the development of the Bill Of Rights (Especially as to the Second Amendment) and the Constitution as they occurred and in a logical sequence.;
3. The "Conclusions" chapter are very apparently the opinions of Mr. Halbrook and honestly separated from the body of this history.

Those who teach materials as to the subjects covered in this work would be unprofessional if they do not read this book. "Misconduct In Public Office" would be the least accusation I would make against any law-maker or jurist who fails to do the same before dealing with gun related issues. Editors and publishers who fail to know the materials in this volume should be considered unprofessional if they fail to consider the facts presented and conclusions made by Mr. Halbrook before reporting or writing editorials on the Second Amendment.

The points I found very interesting are here listed.
1. "The Militia" (Or "general militia) is the whole body of adult-and-free citizens who have a Natural Law Right to own weapons and to carry them anywhere they please AND may have a duty to own weapons for defense of self and his State.
2. The "well regulated militia" noted in the Second Amendment is that part of the "general militia" as organized into companies (Often at a town or village level) and equipped with standard firearms, drilled in military skills and organized into larger units (Usually under officers appointed by the Governor of each State).
3. These (Both) militias were seen as necessary for the defense of each State AND, much more important to most of the founders of the USA, to provide a defense against the potential tyranny of an overly powerful Federal government.
4. The "blunderbuss" was an early type of very short barreled shotgun, much like the sawed-off shotguns. These weapons were, in fact, sought by the members of the short-of-weapons early, revolutionary, militias, This is in opposition to the Federal Court case (Citation needed) which ruled that such shotguns were not nor never a militia weapon.
5. Pocket pistols were carried by our Founding Fathers with no concern as to CCW permits.
6. British General Gage was specially concerned about the "back woodsmen" most specially skilled in accurate long range shooting being often dependent on such hunting skills for survival
7. Even at the time of the writing of our Constitution and Bill Of Rights there were persons who distrusted the People as to possessing arms.

From other readings I note that:
1. Abraham Lincoln was elected as an officer of his militia company in the "Black Hawk War"; And,
2. As late as 1856 The US Supreme Court noted (In the Dred Scott case) that only free citizens could arm themselves and then travel as they saw fit. this being a right of citizens at that time (And now)

FROM: www.crusaderknight.blogspot.com>

Monday, July 16, 2007
Doing Citizen's Duty With A Knife
On the night of July 15-16, 2007 a local armed robber make a considerable mistake. After first attempting to pull away a purse from its owner, he then pulled out a gun. For his efforts he was taught that a knife can put a robber in the hospital, in critical condition, and that there are free citizens who ignore Wisconsin's foolish law against carrying concealed weapons as the police always seem to be too late to prevent such robberies and other crimes.

Now the police are wasting tax-payers' money by searching for the good citizen who did more to prevent crime than they did.

Perhaps a large number of armed, law abiding, citizens with licenses to carry concealed weapons could do more to suppress banditry and other crimes in our State.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Guns, Citizens, Police & Rational Thinking
The following letter was sent on Dec. 11, 2007.

TO THE EDITORS, THE MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL:

First, anyone who is of the opinion that it would be possible to take away all firearms (Even just all handguns) from Americans is in need of therapy for delusional thinking. Such therapy wold be even more required for anyone who believes that criminals would obey any such gun confiscation laws and efforts---Let alone those citizens who have concluded, as did the staff of the US Attorney General, that the right to keep and bear arms is an right of individual citizens and not one limited to members of now non-existent militias.

Secondly, all should note the following:
1. The mass murderer at a Colorado missionary school was killed and stopped by an armed, under that State's just laws, citizen and not by police.
2. The like killer at a same-state mall was enabled in his massacre of our fellow citizens by laws and mall-regulations which made that place a theoretical "gun free zone", which made it into a "free fire zone" for a crazed killer.3.The victims at Virginia Tech and Columbine High School were, in truth, the victims of like "gun free zone" laws, even in State's where citizens generally have the right to CCW (With the inside police officer at the high school apparently running away from danger).
4. The killings at another Virginia university were halted by two students who used their firearms to stop and arrest a killer, even though that beneficial act was delayed by those students having to retrieve their pistols from their autos, the police not being in evidence.
5. In Milwaukee it was armed security guards who shot to death two thugs who fired, from the outside, at the patrons of a well regulated club, the police not being present to protect citizens.
6. In Milwaukee County one unarmed pizza delivery man is murdered by two thugs after another, but armed, such delivery man shoots an "instant socialist" who attempted to take away the product of his honest labor.

Any person with a rational mind should be able to see the pattern as illustrated by the above examples and come (Be forced?) to the conclusion that: Citizens can NOT rely on the police to protect them from killers and other very dangerous criminals; That "gun free zones" (Like the entire State of Wisconsin) are only "free fire zones" for dangerous criminals; And, police objections to CCW are not due to any interest in the safety of their fellow citizens, but only to make their job (Of cleaning up after killings and other crimes) easier and safer for those police officers.
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Register Axes !
My June 5th newspaper brought the news of a youth striking his father with an ax. Such weapons are a great hazard to the public safety (As many claim for firearms) and the following steps must be taken by the Congress and the Legislature.
1. All axes must be registered.
2. No one under 21-years of age is to be allowed to purchase
such a weapon and all buyers of such must be checked out
for prior criminal convictions and mental health commitments
as well as current domestic violence matters.
3. If such military weapons (Look to the movie Brave Heart for
examples of military applications) cannot be removed from
all homes, they must have the heads and handles separated and
those parts kept locked up.
4. No axes must be allowed on campuses (Even those teaching
forestry subjects) as such will prevent insane or criminal persons
from using them to harm students and staff. The same should
be enforces for such public events as sports shows and lumber
jack contests except where state licensed ax specialists are
involved AND in complete control of these horrid weapons.

Of course, there are those who claim that axes do not cause death or injury and
only the people who mis-use them are so responsible; But we liberals know better!

Theoretical Notes On Today's Weapons For Free Citizens

2011-05-15T20:27:00.004-05:00

I note that full-jacketed 0.308 and 5.7x28mm rounds will easily "punch through" (Especially at "at-your-door") the body armor of Nazi like Storm Troopers and
other criminals (eg. Those "Violating Civil Rights Under Color Of Law").

A little research will provide anyone on how to make "Composition C" or "Plastique".
That stuff, some sheet metal and ball bearings, nuts, bolts, fiberglass (Will not show up on many X-rays) and other junk will make a decent Claymore Mine.

Placed at knee level such cut-down-at-the-knees such invaders defended with most body armor.

Of course there is the risk of prosecution and persecution for even building, let alone using such against storm-troopers or other home invaders.

The same research will provide your with plans for non-WMD flame throwers, some which look like canes.

Rebalencing The Constitutions

2011-05-15T20:19:00.001-05:00

The next time (And subsequent times) a candidate for a US Supreme Court appears before the usual committee of the Senate (for a State Supreme Court position) , the following should-and-must be a part of the questioning. Only slight imodifications be needed to use this as a base for interviewing candidates for State Supreme Court positions.

1. Read and attribute the following quote: . President Thomas Jefferson's note on the interpretation of the Constitution: "On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to to the probable one in which it was passed"

2. Then ask the candidate if s/he agrees with that principle: In whole and without reservations; Or, in part and with reservations; Or, not at all.

3-A. For the person who responds a total agreement, ask her/him if they will apply the exact words of the Constitution (As amended) and the intent of the writers as their primary references in writing decisions on cases brought before the Court.

3-B. For those having reservations, ask each such person what those are and "the reasons why" for not agreeing with Mr. Jefferson AND to what extent and under what conditions will such a disagreement take effect.

3-C. For those who fully disagree with Mr.Jefferson, ask them "Why?".

4. For the latter two types of persons, ask: Does the Constitution internally provide for changes (Especially in rights added for or taken away from the People); AND, where in the Constitution is there any provisions for "evolving standards"?

After that first use of these questions, they should be applied to all nominees for Federal (State?) Judicial positions.

The Congress (Legislature), itself, could preface Bills by requiring adherence to Mr. Jefferson's above-cited quote by use of a common preface which requires judges to interpret the subject legislation: First in terms of the words of the Constitution (As amended) and the intent of the relevant authors; Then, the words of the legislation and the intent of its authors. Failure to comply with this could be prima faciie grounds for impeachment and trial.

I think it well past the time when the Peoples elected representative, the Congress (Legislature), should re-balance the three branches of our Federal (State) Government, which balance has become harmful to the Republic due to too much power flowing into the Courts and the Administrative branches.

Another Note To A "Pathological Pacifist"

2011-05-15T08:26:00.004-05:00

ttps://mail.google.com/mail/?zx=85pqjprzs4fn&shva=1#inbox/12ff061382d491ab>

Yesterday I received another note from a very "nice" (NOT in the eariler meaning of accurate and exact) person who is what I consider a "pathological pacifist".
Below you will find another letter-in-depth.

Dear Friends In Christ:

I noted the message you sent me. The following points are made.
1. At this moment I do not have the time to research the noted speech and cannot tell if the quote was or was-not
"taken out of context".
2. As a Latin Rite Catholic I know that I have no need to believe in or follow the "teachings" of any Pope unless he
speaks-or-writes "ex cathedra"
3. As I have previously noted the "peace" you propose is the "peace of desolation", that desolation and ruin (In this era)
comes primarily from Islam's true believers for whom peace-without-conquest if a sin and is an evil. That hard-rock position and
its related crimes must be combated for the sake of the innocent under the authority given to all of his creations by Natural Law.
Natural which includes the hate-less use of such force (Including deadly force) as are needed to defend self and innocents from
criminal (Islamic) attacks.
4. The "peace" you propose-and-defend is, in fact, a form of physical-and-spiritual suicide and, therefore, a most serious sin..
5. Although The Christ indicated that we should "turn the other cheek" after being slapped on the face (Only the most ignorant
would not know that such was a much more serious insult in His era than today), He did not command us to not resist murderers,
rapists, arsonists, child-abusers and others of that horrid ilk.
6. I am, myself, willing to forgive "70 times 70 times" if, and only if, the usual preconditions of the Church are met, being: Declaring
the sin; Stating the acts(s) as sin(s); Asking for forgiveness; Expressing an heart-felt intention to not so sin again; And, in some
cases making restitution and penance. [Over history, the Christians and, for them, the Churches, have done that for the sins committed
against others in the name of Christianity. Over history and to this day, Muslims will NOT do so as to the almost infinite crimes they
have inflicted on the innocent in the name of Islam.]
7. As noted above, hate (And other illicit passions) is (Are) the real risk to the Christian warrior as any use of force (Including
deadly force) must be done in the name of Justice and The Just Judge, without such moral handicaps. (Passion also cripple
the warrior and makes moral and combat judgements dangerous to self-and-others.) Therefore, "striking blows for Christ", AND
NOT FOR SELF, is allowed according to the teachings of the Church as so well defined, by that "Doctor Of The Church"
St. Bernard of Clairvaux, in his "De Laude Militae Novae".
9. For myself, I will: Not ask soldiers to give up their profession, but only ask that they be just; Will praise most of the USA's
"Centurions" of this era as men of great Faith; Will maintain the authority of the state to "use the sword" (Or AR-15s) to punish evil-doers;
And, will maintain my right, under Natural Law and in a democracy, to be a citizen-soldier, a centurion and, as a part of the first line of just
defense against all domestic and foreign criminals, a user of the sword-of-justice.
10. I am fully prepared to be judged for these positions and any related acts, At age 72-years, I do not expect to wait long for that
Judgement.

CHRIST RULER! CHRIST VICTOR!

PS---Oh yes: Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Living God, have mercy on me a sinner; Savior of the world, save thy people!

My Final Position On CCW For Wisconsin

2011-05-13T16:35:00.001-05:00

I have recently: Reread Article-1, Section-25 of the Wisconsin Constitution; Reconsidered the many laws we have against the misuse of firearms (eg Murder. Substantial Battery; Reckless/Intoxicated Used Of Firearms; Possession Of A Firearm By A Felon); The fact that the punishments for other crimes can be enhanced by the possession of a firearm while committing such a crime); And, the below-noted and anti-democracy "tricks" used to repress the rights of the People.

Please remember that excessive fees (ie Poll Taxes) have been previously used to exclude Blacks and poor people from exercising their constitutional rights. The costs associated with any mandatory training, fingerprint checks and ID cards could add up to like excessive costs.

The costs of any CCW license (If, and only if, any is required) should be no more than the cost of an ID card (eg As issued by DOT) and the cost of doing a electronic check to see if the applicant is qualified under either Wisconsin or US law to purchase a firearm.

I also note that unreasonable and ambiguous tests have likewise been used to limit constitutional rights. As to shooting tests the usual 50-foot test is NOT applicable to self-defense as the usual distance in self-defense is not more than half that distance AND the most common use of firearms for that purpose is the "mere" display of a gun. How does anyone test the ability of a citizen to use a concealed knife or other non-firearm weapon as surprise is essential to the effective use of such devices?

The "1000-foot) exclusion around schools make it impossible to exercise the "right to keep and bear arms" in any urban area.

The rational and pro-freedom solution is to punish only misuses of weapons and not the mere carrying of them---Which is already done by those who misuse weapons AND, to be honest, by many otherwise law-abiding citizens who wish equal rights with robbers and other criminals..

Private property (Along with jails, prisons, mental health facilities, court houses, power plants) can be "posted" against the carrying of weapons and violations treated as "Criminal Trespass". As constitutional rights do not stop at the physical boundaries of publicly funded-and-owned UW, that disorganization shall not be able to forbid CCW on campus.

Therefore, the only CCW law we should have is no such law; But, the ongoing and strict enforcement of our already existing laws for the misuse of such inanimate devices.

PS #1---The Shepherd Express and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's editorial positions on CCW tipped me from supporting a very loose and "must issue" CCW permit law to the "no permit required" position defended above. I thank them!!!

PS #2---Before Michigan passed its CCW law, various Police Chiefs there predicted "blood running in the streets". That did not happen. At least one Chief had the good grace to note his error.

PS #3---Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

================================================================

NOTES

MAXIM: "When a criminal attack is only seconds away, the police are only minutes away (And in rural or wilderness areas, only hours away)".
=================================================================

Please Specially Note: There is no positive correlation between CCW and violent crimes (Including night time burglary of homes). There are such positive correlations between such crimes and: Race; And, cities under Democrat administration or with mayors-and-aldermen associated with that Party.

==================================================================
Doing Citizen's Duty With A Knife

On the night of July 15-16, 2007 a Milwaukee area and armed robber made a considerable mistake. After first attempting to pull away a purse from its owner, he then pulled out a gun. For his efforts he was taught that a knife can put a robber in the hospital, in critical condition, and that there are free citizens who ignore Wisconsin's foolish law against carrying concealed weapons as the police always seem to be too late to prevent such robberies and other crimes.

Now the police are wasting tax-payers' money by searching for the good citizen who did more to prevent crime than they did.

Perhaps a larger number of armed, law abiding, citizens carrying concealed weapons could do more to suppress banditry and other crimes in our State.

Perhaps, the recent drop in violent crimes is more a matter of more citizens ignoring

anti-CCW laws than by any police actions. The police are usually too late to do anything but "count bodies and pick up pieces".

=================================================================
Gun Free Zone = Free Fire Zone
I have been reliably informed that the Omaha mall, the site of a recent massacre, was a "Gun Free Zone" by State Law and mall regulations. Like Virginia Tech (Columbine HS, Wisconsin's Weston HS, and other schools and places) "Gun Free Zone" really means "Free Fire Zone For Crazy Criminals", who can kill people in such places with the reasonable expectation that the police, who never seem to prevent such offenses, and armed citizens (Such as high and grade school staff), who are barred from carrying weapons, will nothing to stop them OR do so at great-and-fatal risk to themselves.

Of course, in Wisconsin the entire State is a "Free Fire Zone" for such murderers due to the State Supreme Court's failure to understand the very exact language of our Constitution as to the rights of the citizens to keep and bear arms AND to the Legislature's failure to enforce the will of about 75% of Wisconsin's voters who added Article-I, Section-25 to Wisconsin's basic law.
=================================================================

Old Enough To Serve & Die: We have still to address the fact that many good citizens, under the age of 21-years are old enough to serve in our Armed Forces, be trained in the most modern and deadly weapons; But, are not old enough to buy a firearm or CCW under any proposed law. They are "old enough to die" in the service of our nation.

Calling On God For Help

2011-05-13T16:08:00.002-05:00

A man was caught in a flood. Two men came by in a boat to rescue him, but he
> waved them away shouting "no the Lord will save me!" One hour later another
> boat came along but again the man cried "no the Lord will save me!"
>
> Eventually a helicopter arrived but still the man insisted"the Lord will save
> me!" unfortunately the man drowned. When he got to the gates of heaven he
> asked St. Peter, " why didn't the Lord save me?" and St. Peter replied "For
> crying out loud, He sent two boats and a helicopter! what more do you want?"

Equitable Responces To Islamic Attacks

2011-05-09T20:13:00.001-05:00

Paraprosdokians

2011-05-08T09:36:00.001-05:00

Many of the following could be applied to editors, professors, "religious leaders",
"anti-religious leaders", politicians, other "yous" and, most specially, ME

HT: Phil B.

..
A paraprosdokian is a figure of speech in which the latter part of a sentence or phrase is surprising or unexpected in a way that causes the reader or listener to reframe or reinterpret the first part. It is frequently used for humorous or dramatic effect, sometimes producing an anticlimax.

1. Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

2. Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.

3. The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.

4. If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.

5. We never really grow up, we only learn how to act in public.

6. War does not determine who is right - only who is left AND who writes the histories.

7. Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

8. Evening news is where they begin with 'Good evening', and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.

9. A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk, I have a work station.

10.. How is it one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?

11.. Dolphins are so smart that within a few weeks of captivity, they can train people to stand on the very edge of the pool and throw them fish.

12.. I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted pay checks.

13.. Whenever I fill out an application, in the part that says "In an emergency, notify:" I put "Doctor".

14.. I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

15.. Behind every successful man is his woman. Behind the fall of a successful man is usually another woman.

16.. You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

17.. The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!

18.. Hospitality: Making your guests feel like they're at home, even if you wish they were.

19.. I discovered I scream the same way whether I'm about to be devoured by a great white shark or if a piece of seaweed touches my foot.

20.. There's a fine line between cuddling and holding someone down so they can't get away.

21.. I always take life with a grain of salt, plus a slice of lemon, and a shot of tequila.

22.. When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water.

23.. You're never too old to learn something stupid.

24.. To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.

25. I prayed to God for a new bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and prayed for forgiveness.

A Theoretical Note On Fuel Air Bombs

2011-04-29T18:39:00.004-05:00

Select Reading List On Islam

2011-04-28T19:15:00.006-05:00

NOTE BENE: If you wish this list sent by email to you, for easier access,please send a request to me a jamespawlak1@gmail.com

(1) Blog: Crusader Knight
Post: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; A Book Of Note
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2011/03/islam-dhimmitude-and-freedom.html

(2) A review of the book
Allah Is Dead: Why Islam Is Not A Religion. (You might find it “convenient” to read the last chapter, a summary, first before attempting to plow through the basic text.)

(3) Post: "The Closing Of The Muslim Mind": A Book Review
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/09/closing-of-muslim-mind-book-review.html

(4) Post: Islam's Nature & Growth Patterns: Key Document
Link: http://crus aderknight.bl ogspot.com/20 09/03/islams -nature-growt h-
patterns-ke y.html&&l t;span< /span>>am p; amp; lt;< ;span& gt;span>/s pan>

(5) Post: "Moderate Muslims"???
Link: < http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/08/moderate-muslims.>

(6) Post: Islamophobia???
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2008/07/islamophobia.html

(7) Post: John Q. Adams On Islam & Christianity
Link:

(8) Post: Islam & Like Religious Veneer Terrorist Groups
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/10/islam-like-religious-veneer-terrorist.html

TO OBTAIN EASIER ACCESS TO THESE REFERENCES YOU ARE WELCOME TO SEND A REQUEST, WITH AN EMAIL RETURN ADDRESS TO ME A "james pawlak1 (at) gmail (dot) dom.

======================================================================

Forensic Examinaiton Of Documents

2011-04-28T07:53:00.002-05:00

To be honest,and as a non-birther, I am appalled by the lack of scientific knowledge as to the (Forensic) examinations of such documents as birth certificates AND the reliance on other-than-scientific evidence by news reporters, commentators and other "folks".

A real examination and proof of validity-or-forgery would require at-the-least:
1. A chemical examination (Requiring only very, very, small samples) of the questioned document and, if applicable, eleven or so before-and-after it in any bound-collection; And,
2. Comparison of the handwriting on that document to the hand-writing of the same persons on similar and other documents from various sources.
3. Careful examination of the type-cases and impressions on relative documents.

As to newspaper "birth announcements" it would be necessary to do the same for hard-copes of old news papers presented as "real". (I do wonder if those which date back more than 20-years are kept in any style other than easily changed electronic records.)

Of course, any records of a VIP (With access to highly skilled persons and the power to buy or otherwise obtain the needed procedures) could be altered by "creating a legend".

A Warning, Wrath & Obama

2011-04-20T20:44:00.006-05:00

Can anyone produce any example of Mr. Barrack H. Obama doing anything in the areas of foreign relations and use of our military which has done anything except embarrass and weaken the USA?

He has: Insulted or betrayed our once best allies of the United Kingdom, Poland and the Czech Republic; Weakened us in the eyes of the well source of terrorism and asymmetrical warfare in this world, Islam, by his "Cairo Speech" and bowing down to the effective leader of that ideology, the King of Saudi Arabia; Continued the prior administrations' (Both parties) in maintaining a top-heavy military plagued by too many "political" admirals and generals; Involved us in a third war, in an Islamic nation, without consideration of the end results of that poorly considered action, which may very well be the turn over of that nation to our worst enemies rather than its misrule by a previously cowed dictator; Allowed, Communist China to wage electronic and economic war against the USA without taking such actions (eg Not forcing that arrogant nation to regularized the value of its currency And, other like acts of stumbling error.

In addition, he (Along with some prior administrations) raised our national debt to a nation-destroying level and most certainly appears to have no intention of not continuing that internal war against the People of our nation.

Mr. Obama has (Like prior presidents) failed to take such actions along our Southern border as would effectively stop the flood of job thieves, bearers of untreatable diseases
(eg Drug resistant TB), previously deported "gang bangers", AND heavily armed "hit teams", kidnapping squads, drug smugglers, terrorists and other such scum. This has become much more critical in the last two years by reason of the stresses on our economic well being AND the reported increase of "undocumented" persons of Middle-Eastern origin. Those Americans living on that border are being put in daily and deadly danger from the lack of security in those areas.

Mr. Obama has been too much aided in the above offenses by too many Members of the Congress, most in his own Party, but also those RINOs who have been corrupted by too many years "inside the belt-line".

If this continues all political leaders, most specially those who continue to support the above and dangerous behaviors, will do well to FEAR the wrath of the People and, perhaps, that of our Legions (Who will be supported by their fellow citizens).

SOME RELEVANT QUOTES
(1)
“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it” (George Santayana)

(2) The piece – whose authenticity is admittedly open to question – is attributed to “Centurion Marcus Flavinius, Second Cohort, Augusta Legion to his cousin Tertullus in Rome.

“We had been told, on leaving our native soil,” wrote the centurion Marcus Flavius to a cousin back in Rome, “that we were going to defend the sacred rights conferred on us by so many of our citizens [and to aid] populations in need of our assistance and our civilization.” For such a cause, he and his comrades had willingly offered to “shed our quota of blood, to sacrifice our youth and our hopes.” Yet the news from the homeland was disconcerting: The capital was seemingly rife with factions, treachery and petty politics. “Make haste,” Marcus Flavius continued, “and tell me that our fellow citizens understand us, support us and protect us as we ourselves are protecting the glory of the empire.”

“If it should be otherwise, if we should have to leave our bleached bones on these desert sands in vain,then beware of the anger of the legions."

(3) Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam!

Islam VS Democracy---Again

2011-04-19T07:48:00.002-05:00

From today's news we were informed that, in an apparently fair election, the People of Nigeria reelected their Christian president over a Muslim opponent. The result was riots, gun fire, an externally forced prison break and other violence by Muslims.

At least those Muslims are consistent in following the teachings of Mohammed as to Muslims to be ruled only by Muslims. They also reinforced the predictions, based on
the percentage of Muslims in any given jurisdiction (eg Somalia, The Sudan, Dearborn, Michigan), given by at least one scholar. (1).

This was no reaction only by some small sub-class of "extremists", but the predictable reaction to be expected of Muslims who are any appreciable portion of the general population, which should be known to all who study history.

Ceterum autem censeo, Mecca esse delendam! (2)

NOTES
(1) Post: Islam's Nature & Growth Patterns: Key Document
Link: http://crus aderknight.bl ogspot.com/20 09/03/islams -nature-growt h-
patterns-ke y.html&&l t;span< /span>>am p; amp; lt;< ;span& gt;span>/s pan>

(2) Post: "Mecca Delenda Est"--The Why & How
Link: http://crusaderknight.blogspot.com/2010/01/mecca-delenda-est-why-how.html

Creating A Personal "Legend"

2011-04-18T15:29:00.001-05:00

In the world of espionage there is the concept of a “legend” a created personal history based on: Real facts; Modified facts; And, most importantly, invented facts by such means as faked documents and inserting them in both public and private record bases. Where that cannot be done, it is not unheard of to eliminate or block-block access to them.

For example, if I had the money and political power I might be able to create a new identity for myself by such means as: Inserting birth certificates in county, state and hospital records; Inserting birth announcements in newspapers' “morgues”; Blocking access to such by use of the laws regarding them; Blocking access to claimed school records by misapplying the laws allowing such confidentiality as forbid schools from even acknowledging that a person attended or did-not attend a school; And, like techniques.

Does this bring anyone to mind?

Oh Hell: Let's Offend Everyone!

2011-04-13T16:47:00.003-05:00

Q. What's the Cuban National Anthem?
A. Row, Row, Row Your Boat.

Q. Where does an Irish family go on vacation?
A. A different bar.

Q. What did the Chinese couple name their
tan, curly-haired baby?
A. Sum Ting Wong.

Q. What do you call it when an Italian has
one arm shorter than the other?
A. A speech impediment.

Q. Why are there no Muslims in Science Fiction TV shows and movies?
A. Because: There were none in Mohammed's flat-earth Arabia; "Allahu Akbar" does not translate into Klingon; Islam has no future; And, there are no goats in outer space.

Q. Why aren't there any Puerto Ricans on Star
Trek ?
A. Because they're not going to work in the future either.

Q. Why do Driver Ed classes in redneck schools use the car only on Mondays,
Wednesdays and Fridays?
A. Because on Tuesday and Thursday, the Sex Ed class uses it.

Q. What's the difference between a southern zoo and a northern zoo?
A. The southern zoo has a description of the animal along with a recipe.

Q. How do you get a sweet little 80-year-old
lady to say the 'F' word?
A. Get another sweet little 80-year-old lady to yell, 'BINGO!'

Q. What's the difference between a northern
fairytale and a southern fairytale???
A. A northern fairytale begins, ...'Once upon a time...'A southern fairytale
begins, ... 'Y'all ain't gonna believe this shit.'

Q. Why doesn't Mexico have an Olympic team?
A. Because all the Mexicans who can run, jump or swim are
already in the United States ?!!!!

AND, AS A POLE, MY FAVORITE---
Q. How did all the Pollacks get here?
A. Two swam over and the rest walked over on the scum.

OH shut up ... just pass it on!.....

Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; A Book Of Note

2011-03-31T18:43:00.002-05:00

DURIE, Mark; THE THIRD CHOICE: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom; (Forward by Bat Ye'or);
Deror Press; ISBN 978-0-9807223-0-7.

This work presents Islam in a rational, logical, well foot-noted and dispassionate manner as leaves it free of any hint of “Islamophobia” and other forms of bias. It could and should be used as a basic text in any courses, touching on Islam, in: Anthropology; Sociology; Comparative legal systems; Political Science; History; Social Psychology.

Muslims are likely to reject and resent this work as it clearly illuminates the “disinformation” (ie Lying) used by them to hide the dark side of Islam, its founder, teachings and collective behaviors over the last 1400-plus years.

I suggest that any public figure who speaks or writes on Islam and Muslims, once notified of this work, who does so without reading it is lying-to-self and all who hear or read their offerings AND join in the basic Islamic tactic of “disinfomation”.

Ideal Affirmative Action Candidate

2011-03-12T18:55:00.002-06:00

The ideal candidate for California's or other jurisdiction's affirmative action discrimination programs IS a: Hispanic surnamed, Black, Lesbian, sex-changed, "female", "kill and immediately eat red meat fanatic", substance abusing, dishonorably discharged military vet, parolee, with one leg, a glass eye, a very repulsive skin disease and bad breath, who is now unemployed after being fired from "her" prior position as a Priestess within a San Francisco Satan-Worshiping congregation for being "too evil"and was previously expelled by the University Of California-Berkely (Political Science Major) AND from all local political organizations and Mosques for being "too radically leftist" or too violent

Will The National Guard Teach My Children

2011-03-02T20:15:00.003-06:00

"Will The National Guard Teach My Children" was a sign carried, I assume by a teacher, among the other noisy and noisome mob in and about Wisconsin's Capitol Building.

In fact, that is a most excellent idea---If we would expand it to retired military and those who have completed their rehabilitation for war-wounds. These men and women, many of whom have university degrees or their equivalents or such experience in what are known as "the trades" as would allow them to teach the academic-of-vocational classes assigned to them.

Much more importantly, they could-and-would teach the true value of duty as a balance to and prerequisite to both priviledges (As union bargining, driving an auto) or true rights (eg Voting, keeping and bearing arms, free speech and free practice of religion).

It might be very good for that more-than-zaftig teacher to be replaces by a lean ex-trooper (Perhaps without legs as replaced by steel devices) who is very interested in the real future of American by teaching duty-and-responsibility, in addition to academic/vocational class materials. This is the real meaning of being an American. Certainly, our future voters should learn those subjects and the "price of freedom".

Olive Branches & Limits Of Compromise

2011-02-26T08:22:00.004-06:00

On Feb. 26, 2011 the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel offered the editorial "Offer an oliver branch" as advise to Wisconsin's Republicans. This editorial suggests that Wisconsin Republicans compromise with the Legislature's Democrat Senators. As the Editors pointed out, this would NOT be a reflection of what Democrats did, two years' ago, when the People reelected that Party to control of our State's government and a tax increase bill was inflicted, without debate, on Wisconsin by Democrats.

Keep in mind: Compromise with a child's (Or the wearers of jail-house-orange shirted mobs') tantrums only encourages more of the same; Compromise with law breakers (eg Street criminals, unlawfully absent teachers and State Senators) does the same; Compromise with pirates (As in Somalia), dictators (eg Hitler) and other evil men only encourages them to expand their evil.

This is based on both the evidence of scientific psychology and the examples of history. (To paraphrase: Those who do not study, learn from and act upon the lessons of history will be condemned to repeat it.)

In other words, there is a boundry between "compromise as the "life-blood of politics" and illicit, asinie and crime-producing compromise. The noted editorial encouraged the latter.

Christ & Self-Defense

2011-02-20T20:45:00.001-06:00

Jesus the Christ sent his disciples out without any possession to spread "The Good News" (Luke 22:35). Upon their return and (Can we assume?) because of what they experienced on that earlier expedition on the dangerous roads and among the contentious people of Israel and surrounding areas, He had other instructions and commands for them.

Among those other commands was that they should do every thing possible (Including selling their most basic garments) to obtain swords. When his disciples presented him with the two such weapons they had, He said: "They are sufficient" or "They are enough" (Variation by translation for the balance of Luke 22:35). Since the Christ was NOT sending out armies to reestablish an independent Israel (A disappointment to some of his followers), two swords appeared to be "sufficient" to protect his law-abiding followers on their travels.

Now--I have read a variety of interpretations of these verses which all appear to be pathological pacifists' misreadings of plain text. Some have claimed that Jesus was being sarcastic or ironic or using a parable--Without any proofs of that and in opposition to the most direct statement and the usual parable-style of His other teachings.

Others have claimed that Jesus, the "Prince of Peace", would not support the arming of his followers with swords (The AK-47s or AR-15s of that era), conveniently forgetting his whipping out of the money changers in the Temple, his words about child abusers and Judas and the frequent Words about the punishment of evil doers and unworthy servants.

Yes--He did teach peace and "turning the other cheek"--To insults. However, there is nothing in the Gospel teaching that anyone should submit to such criminal attacks as murder, rape, robbery, genocide (The use of which are supported by the Koran, Nazi ideology and practices and the injustices inflicted by other tyrants now and throughout history),

We should also remember: The advice of St. John the Baptist to the soldiers, which was NOT to give up their swords and profession; The writings of St. Paul as to the State's authority to use the sword to punish wrongdoers; And, the very clear advise of St. Bernard of Clairvaux (In his De Laude Novae Militae) as to waging war against those who attack Christians (Muslims in his time and, as likely as not, in our time).

Pathological Pacifists Worshiping Death

2011-02-20T20:35:00.002-06:00

In recent months I have had many contacts with a couple who I can only describe as “pathological pacifists”. These individuals BELIEVE that it is against the teachings of Jesus the Christ to offer any resistance to evil doers, even murderers, rapists, child-molester, arsonists, the Jihad-waging followers of the false prophet Mohammed and others of that ilk. They BELIEVE that no Christian should ever, never, use deadly force to resist those monsters.

I could not get them to directly address the Christ's acts and words of violence. Most specially I could not get them to directly address Jesus' absolute command to his disciples to arm themselves with swords (The AK-47s and AR-16s of that time) as noted in Luke 22:36-38; Two swords being enough to protect the disciples on the bandit infested roads of that day, yet not enough to give the impression of any attempt to set up a worldly kingdom.

Those pathological pacifists, in fact, worship death and, doing so, are no better than the Thugee of India, the blood cultists of the Aztecs Hitler's SS and, most specially, those who follow the teachings of the Koran.

Teach Intolerance!

2011-02-17T07:32:00.002-06:00

Today I noted some return address labels, in my collection from various charitable organizations, which read "Teach Tolerance".

Rather I would prefer such as state "Teach Intolerance!"! That is, teach intolerance of murder, genocide, rape, enslavement, perpetual war, those who oppose real science and creative arts, equal and Natural rights for all humans and the like.

In other words, teach intolerance of Nazism, Fascism, Atheistic Communism AND, especially in this era, Islam (As there are no declared "moderate Muslims").

Oh, I threw the noted labels away.

Congress & GOP Leading By Example---NOT

2011-02-06T08:45:00.005-06:00

Buried in today's paper was an article noting that the Congress has proposed a cut in its budget much smaller than that proposed for the other parts of our government.

Now that the Republican Party has control of the House Of Representatives, out of which all money spending Bills must come, there is no excuse for this horrid example of "do as I say and not as I do" anti-philosophy.

I will "believe" that Republicans are sincere and effective about controlling our Federal government's spending when they initiate and force through such measures as would: Reduce their salaries by 10% until such time as we have a balanced budget without borrowing money; Require Members and their staff to pay "fair market value" for such fringe benefits as retirement, health insurance, hair cuts, meals in the Congress' restaurants and the other like "goodies" they get; Require members to cut their staff budgets by 10% (Same condition as above; And, without "out-sourcing")

The House can also cut the number and grossly over-pay of Federal bureaucrats; And, should start with Mr. Obama's Czars who are not subject to the same Congressional control as the already in-place Department Secretaries and Under-Secretaries.

Any refusal by Democrats will make good "ammo" for the GOP's use in the 2012 election. Refusal by Republicans would provide the "other Party" with far too much like "ammo".

I will believe the effectiveness of "Tea Party" organizations when they make very public either parties' Members refusal to go along with such measures

Effective Use Of Military To Secure USA Borders

2011-01-23T15:43:00.003-06:00

I strongly disagree with the statement that we have "tried everything" to secure our Southern border against the flood of drug dealers, terrorists, gang-members and paroled prisoners returning here after prior deportation, carriers of untreatable diseases (eg Drug resistant TB), job and identity thieves and such like unamerican trash.

One and untried method is as offered here:
1. Restrict the Border Patrol to urban areas and a thousand yards on either side of authorized, rural crossing points;
2. Allow anyone to cross into Mexico, without question, at any authorized crossing point or station;
3. Use four rows of razor ribbon coils In addition to the fences yet to be build and those sort-of in place along the entire border except for roads leading to authorized crossing points;
4. Make the balance of our border, for the first 1000-yards into the USA, a military zoneith posted notices in English, Spanish, Parsi, Arabic and local Native American languages that persons entering illegally there will be treated as invaders and will be shot, without warning if they are armed or resist arrest, and otherwise taken into custody for forced deportation or TRIAL BY MILITARY COMMISSION.

The troops could be regulars (Some brought back from Europe whose countries appear unwilling to defend themselves), reservists, National Guard and members of the General Militia (Also ad hoc posses raised by Sheriffs, mayors, JPs and other local government officials)

Attorneys & GNP

2011-01-21T19:17:00.003-06:00

It appears that the usually billed "services" of attorneys are included in the USA 's Gross National Product.along with those of dentists, physicians, landscapers and other independent craftsmen, legitimate massage therapists , and other like persons.

But, what do attorneys produce? Oh, there are some who defend the innocent, prosecute the guilty, insure a fair criminal or civil trial, arrange for the proper distribution of the property of those who have died and, sometimes, bring people closer together than otherwise.

But, too many (Most?) of attorneys in the USA feed off the overly complex laws and government regulations inflicted on the People; Laws-and-rules that they, for the most part, created as members of the Congress and other legislative bodies, as well as the administrative agencies that they dominate. Of course, they properly also control the remaining, judicial, branch of government (Although there are other models for oversight of the judicial process.)

We should ask the following questions and reflect on them and the probable answers.
1.. What part of our GNP is "services by attorneys"?
2. How does that compare with today's economic powerhouses of Japan , India and the People's Republic of China ?
3. How many words of laws and regulations are in-effect and put-into-effect in the USA each year VS. those other nations?
4. Would the People of the USA be better off if Attorneys were barred, by Amending our Constitution, from being Members of the Congress? (And allowing the Several States to do the same for their Legislatures?)

Guns 1000-ft From Congress-Critters: NOT+

2011-01-11T20:26:00.003-06:00

With very rare exceptions I have agreed with and supported the positions Congressman Peter King has put forth! The only such exception I can think of is his very recent proposal to forbid the possession of a firearm within 1,000-feet of a Member of the Congress.

That proposal fails tests-of-reason, of which I have provided below a few.
1. Criminals and "crazies" do NOT obey such laws.
2. A thousand-feet is a "close in shot" for many trained riflemen such as the Texas Tower Killer and the left-wing goon who murdered President Kennedy.; Some riflemen can hit targets at over 1,500-yards.
3. "Gun free zones" quickly become "free fire zones" (eg Virginia Tech U., Northern Illinois University and, for that matter, Columbine High School, where the on-site police officer ran away from danger) The presumption of gun-free-status can lean to relaxed security.
4. As a matter of "due process", how could an apolitical hunter know than a Member in within a 1000-feet of where s/he might be?

I am very grateful that the Arizona killer did not use a vest/car/fuel-air bomb

Constitutionally Protecting The Constitution

2011-01-08T14:43:00.001-06:00

The greatest internal danger to the rights, under our Constitution, of US Citizens lies not in revolutionaries, jihadi, dishonest politicians, but in those Federal Courts where the judges worshipTHE LAW and themselves far more than those rights and, most particularly, the intent of the authors of the constitution and of its later amendments.

Those judges have "discovered" rights not in the Constitution and not intended by the above noted authors. Those judges have established "evolving standards..." which are most certainly not in the Constitution. In both cases, the Constitution, itself, provides the means, by amendment, to do such things.

To constitutionally protect the Constitution from such abuses I suggest we look to President Thomas Jefferson for guidance and enact an amendment to our basic law, TO WIT:
" (A) In all decisions of the Courts of the United States judges shall declare those parts of the Constitution, as amended, upon which those decisions are based and consider the words and intent of the authors of the Constitution and its Amendments as the primary base for such judicial actions to the exclusion of all other views.
(B) Those courts shall not rely upon the decisions of courts or other bodies outside the United States as to the Constitution and laws of the United States and of the Several States.
(C) The Constitution is the sole authority for the adding to or removing of the rights of the People of the United States.
(D) This Amendment shall take effect upon ratification; But it is not retroactive in its force."

I put to you that this will return the authority and power of the Constitution to the People AND bring back into balance the power of the three branches of government.

Our Real State Religion

2011-01-04T19:39:00.000-06:00

Forget that nonsense that there is a wall of separation between church and state in the USA. We have an official, growing and ever more powerful state religion. That religion is the Law---As made by judges, especially those in our Federal Courts. You think not? Please examine the present and probable future state of the law under our judges as if it were a religion. You will see the religion-of-the-law exposed in the facts.

Our law has a “holy book”, called the Constitution. Our judges claim that they cling to the teachings of that document; But, vary from it as much as did the Catholic and Protestant fanatics of the Reformation and Counter-Reformation varied from the teachings of Jesus Christ when they burned and murdered each other. The “priests” or “mullahs” of that religion are, of course, judges. The “High Priests” or “Grand Ayatollahs” are the Supreme Court Justices. Their “dogma” is set in their judgments. Our judges take the clear and simple teachings of the Constitution and subject them to “mystical interpretation” in an effort to make us think that black-is-white, up-is-down and truth-is-lies.

They claim to uphold the Constitution's protection of individuals, but had allowed children, at the point-of-birth, to have their brains sucked out of their little skulls to facilitate abortions (And still allow the dismemberment of such children)---Even when there is no threat to the life of their mothers. Those judges claim to only interpret our American Constitution in light of the democratically passed laws of the People's elected representative, but use the legal decisions of foreign nations in their making of laws. They ignore the provision in our Constitution for its amendment and declare that new “rights” exist without the consent of the People. They repeatedly inflict their own social and political judgments and show great disdain for democratically approved laws. They suppress the joined freedom-of-speech and free expression of religion by denying the People to present their religion by such expressions as posting or exhibiting the Ten Commandments or other like symbols on public land. [This last technique is one common to power hungry priest-hoods, which is to do every thing possible to suppress and destroy other religions.].

When the founders of this nation outlined our government in our Constitution, they set a careful balance between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. That balance has been seriously disturbed and the whole structure of our government now is moving towards collapse and the dictatorship of the judicial elite---Who care little for democracy. That balance must be reset. My suggestion to enact the following Amendment to the Constitution, which would give the Congress the power to correct the errors which have infiltrated our society by judicial usurpations.

The Congress of the United States may reverse or nullify any decision of the
Supreme Court of the United States or of the lesser Courts of Appeal by a two-
thirds vote of the member present and voting in either House OR by a simple
majority of the members present and voting in both the Senate and House of
Representatives. The vote of each member of the Congress in such matters is to
be separately recorded and immediately made public. Such matters are to have
priority over all other business of the Congress.

The recording and immediate release is to prevent the members of the Congress from hiding behind the curtain of voice votes. The granting of such matters absolute priority is to prevent such matters from being “buried in committee”.

Of course, the “bother” of amending the Constitution could be avoided by the confirmation of new Justices on our Supreme Court and judges to other courts as will NOT make laws, but only interpret them according to our State and Federal Constitutions and the intent of the People as expressed by the intent of their representatives who wrote those documents.

I also note that this “worship” of the “Great God Law” is only the face of “Secular Humanism” which, in turn, is the front or false-flag for the “religion” of Atheism. (Every court decision restricting the rights of “free exercise” of other religions is a blow for the USA's state religion of law, secular humanism and atheism.)

At the least, the Federal Courts have declared “Atheism” a religion (James J. Kaufman VS Gary R. McCaughtey et.al.; 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, #04-1914; Decided On
August 19, 2005)

World's Largest Army---US Hunters?

2010-12-23T08:02:00.001-06:00

The World's Largest Army. America's Hunters?

The state of Wisconsin has gone an entire deer hunting season without someone getting killed. That's great. There were over 600,000 hunters. Allow me to restate that number. Over the last two months, the eighth largest army in the world - more men under arms than Iran; more than France and Germany combined - deployed to the woods of a single American state to help keep the deer menace at bay. But that pales in comparison to the 750,000 who are in the woods of Pennsylvania this week. Michigan 's 700,000 hunters have now returned home. Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia , and it is literally the case that the hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world. America will forever be safe from foreign invasion of troops with that kind of home-grown firepower.

Hunting - it's not just a way to fill the freezer. It's a matter of national security!

Now you know why the liberal anti-gun group wants to take the guns away.

Believing Republicans On Budget Reforms

2010-11-13T07:40:00.001-06:00

I will "believe" that Republicans are sincere and effective about controlling our Federal government's spending when they initiate and force through such measures as would: Reduce their salaries by 10% until such time as we have a balanced budget without borrowing money; Require Members and their staff to pay "fair market value" for such fringe benefits as retirement, health insurance, hair cuts, meals in the Congress' restaurants and the other like "goodies" they get; Require members to cut their staff budgets by 10% (Same condition as above; And, without "out-sourcing")

The House can also cut the number and grossly over-pay of Federal bureaucrats; And, should start with Mr. Obama's Czars who are not subject to the same Congressional control as the already in-place Department Secretaries and Under-Secretaries.

Any refusal by Democrats will make good "ammo" for the GOP's use in the 2012 election. Refusal by Republicans would provide the "other Party" with far too much like "ammo".

I will believe the effectiveness of "Tea Party" organizations when they make very public either parties' Members refusal to go along with such measures.

A Litany For Crusaders

2010-11-02T15:12:00.003-05:00

A LITANY FOR CRUSADERS

Benedictus dominus deus meus qui docet manus meas ad proelium

COPYRIGHT: 2004
By James Pawlak
All Rights Reserved

DEDICATION

To all the Crusaders who have put their lives and very souls at risk in taking up arms against all false prophets and enemies of the Faith throughout all the centuries. THESE WERE AND ARE THE TRUE WITNESSES, MARTYRS, OF AND FOR THE FAITH.

ECCLISIASTICAL APPROVAL SOUGHT

Copies of this document were sent to Most Reverend Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of Milwaukee, for ecclesiastical approval. As of the time of this publication no response, as to such approval, was had from him except a meaningless letter filled with platitudes about martyrs.

Greeting

In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
Amen

Litany

As Christ Jesus is our Ruler and his saints and blessed ones our friends, let us pray:

Christ Jesus Ruler, Christ Jesus Victor,
Have mercy on us;

Sword-of-Victory,
Have mercy on us;

Lord of Splendor, Grace and Glory,
Have mercy on us;

Eternal Judge,
Have mercy on us;

Holy God! Holy Mighty One! Holy Immortal One!
Have mercy on us;

St. Louis, Crusader, King and good friend of the
King-of-Kings,
Pray for us;

St. Michael the Archangel, Victor over the Evil One,
Pray for us;

St. Joan of Arc, Armored in Virtue,
Pray for us;

St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Doctor of the Church and Definer of
True Knighthood,
Pray for us;

St. Acarius of Byzantium, Martyr and truly good Centurion,
Pray for us;

St. George, Martyr and soldier;
Pray for us;

St. Adrian of Nicomedia, Officer and Martyr,
Pray for us;

St. Ignatius of Loyola, Soldier and commander of men,
Pray for us;

St. James, Apostle of Christ and banner of the Spanish Crusaders,
Pray for us;

St. Theodore Statelates, General and Martyr,
Pray for us;

St. Gabriel Possenti, Pistol shooting protector of the innocent;
Pray for us;

Blessed Mark d'Aviano, Preacher against the attackers of the Christian lands, flame for Crusaders;
Pray for us;

All Crusaders in every time and place;
Pray for us.

Gospel Reading

The Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, according to St. Luke, the twenty-second chapter, verses thirty-five through thirty-eight.

And He said to them, “WHEN I SENT YOU WITH NO
PURSE OR BAG OR SANDALS, DID YOU LACK ANYTHING?” They said, “Nothing”. He said to them,
“BUT NOW, HE WHO HAS A PURSE TAKE IT AND
LIKEWISE A BAG. AND LET HIM WHO HAS NO SWORD
SELL HIS CLOAK AND BUY ONE. FOR I TELL YOU THAT
THIS SCRIPTURE MUST BE FUFILLED IN ME. 'AND HE
WAS RECKONED WITH TRANSGRESSORS' ; FOR WHAT
IS WRITTEN ABOUT ME HAS ITS FULFILLMENT.” And,
they said, “Look, Lord, here are two swords”. And he
said unto them, “THEY ARE SUFFICIENT”.

The Gospel of the Lord!

Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ!

Homily/Sermon/Talk

(Please see the notes below as to directions.)

Psalm

Blessed be the Lord my God who teacheth my hands to fight and my fingers to war.

Blessed be the Lord my God who teacheth my hands to fight and my fingers to war.

Crusader's Prayer

As we prepare to go forth, let us pray.
Here we are with our willing hearts and our two swords, ready to defend against the external and internal enemies of Your Churches and Peoples. Please be our Commander and Leader against those who would destroy the Faith.

Amen! Now and forever, for the age of ages, AMEN!

Dismissal

In the Name of The Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit go forth to defend the Faith.

We march forth with thanks to God!

SUGGESTED MEMORIAL DAYS
FOR THE RECITATION OF THIS SERVICE

January 21st---(In the United States) To remind us of the temporary victory of the Evil One when the internal enemies of life and Christ convinced the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Roe VS. Wade to allow abortion upon demand. (Outside of the United States of America, some equivalent memorial day may be chosen.)

March 23rd---To remind us of the independence of the Greeks from Mohammedan Turkish rule.

April 18th---To remind us of the forced ejection of the Mohammedan Turks from Beograd.

May 8th---In remembrance of the end of the “Crusade in Europe”, being “V-E Day”, the end of the Nazi terror.

August 16th---Being “V-J Day”; To reflect on the millions who died to defend civilization against all types of imperial aggression.

September 11th---To remind us of the Mohammedan attacks upon the United States of America and those who died resisting those attacks and in efforts to rescue the endangered victims of that foul attack.

September 12th---To celebrate the defeat of the Mohammedan Turks at Vienna, their last major, land, invasion from the East.

October 7th---To specially note the great sea battle of Lepento where the Mohammedan navy was sent down to defeat.

October 9th---To remember what few do: The defeat of the Mohammedan Turks at Chocim (Followed by the battles at Lvov and Zurawno), their last major attack against Northern Europe.

October 10th---To remember that long ago date when the Christian French, under the command of Charles Martel, defeated the Mohammedan “Moors” at the Battle of Tours.

The memorial days of the saints and blessed ones listed in the litany, being:
February 7th---St. Theodore Stratelates;
February 27th---St. Gabriel Possenti
April 23rd---St. George (November 1st in the Russian Orthodox Church);
May 7th---St. Acacius of Byzantium;
May 30th---St. Joan of Arc;
July 25th---St. James the Greater;
July 31st---St. Ignatius of Loyola;
August 13th—Blessed Marco d'Aviano
August 20th—St. Bernard of Clairvaux
August 25th---St. Louis (IX);
September 8th---St. Adrian of Nicomedia; And,
September 29th---St. Michael the Archangel.

OTHER NOTES

1.In the readings, the words to be spoken by a priest or deacon or, lacking such ordained persons, a prayer leader, are in bold face The words spoken by Christ are in both BOLD FACE AND CAPITOL LETTERS, which words should be spoken only (In order of preference) by a priest, deacon or prayer leader; The words in ordinary type are to be said by all present.
2.If this prayer service is a part of the Holy Mass or Divine Liturgy, it is recommended that it be had just before the dismissal of the People of God..
3.If this litany is had at the end of the Holy Mass or a Divine Liturgy, then any ordained priest or deacon is expected to deliver a suitable homily or sermon at the appropriate place in that service. If this litany is had apart from the Holy Mass or Divine Liturgy, then suitable homily may be given by an ordained cleric or a suitable talk given by a lay prayer leader. “Suitable” here means a sermon on the noted Gospel or a homily or talk of such subjects as: Discerning who the internal and external enemies of the Churches and The Faith are; On means to defend against their attacks or subversions; Self-discipline; The value of prayer in the life and actions of crusaders; The lives of the above-noted saints, on their memorial days; The meaning, to the Churches and Peoples of God and of true civilization, of
the historical events listed above etc..
4.If those present enter in processional or leave the same way, any suitable anthem (e, g, “Holy God We Praise Thy Name”, “Lift High The Cross”, “Mine Eyes Have Seen The Glory”) should be used in the United States. In other nations, equivalent anthems. may be sung. Drums and brass instruments may be used also at such times in suitable, somber or triumphal, march tunes.
5.The Gospel reading's last verse is from the Peshitta New Testament (A new
Aramaic-English translation). Aramaic being the language spoken by Christ and
the translation, “THEY ARE SUFFICIENT”, is more appropriate than the usual, and “loaded”, “THAT IS ENOUGH” as found in too many translations.
6.This litany was written by James Pawlak.

DEUS VULT!

Male Homosexuals & Disease Vectors-Revised

2010-11-01T20:37:00.003-05:00

Milwaukee Magazine's August, 2007 issue contained the story "Gay in the City" which brought to my mind the possible need to cut away all questions of religion or morality when the behaviors of male homosexuals are discussed and limit debate and actions to the purely scientific base of proven public health practices.

From a purely scientific point-of-view, most male homosexuals (Who have clearly demonstrated a general lack of self control and sense of the "common good") represent a disease vector as do the plague bearing fleas on rats, the flies and cockroaches who hang about "unprotected" food and garbage, mosquitoes who carry malaria and other diseases and other like threats to the health of all People.

If the general and Jewish-Christian foundations of morality are ignored (As is the constant drum beat of the homosexual lobby) and only the science of successful public health programs is applied, the best prevention of any epidemic or endemic disease, including HIV/AIDS, is to liquidate the disease vector(s) most responsible for the spread of the attacking illnesses. Therefore, we kill rats and fleas, destroy flies and cockroaches as much as is possible, destroy mosquitoes and ...!

Of course, I cleave to those standards of human-and-humane behaviors held up by traditional Christian and Jewish standards and maintain that the best reaction is: Love the sinner and hate the sin" AND not the views held up (If not reflected in practice) by Muslims and their cousins, the NAZIs.

Terrorists Swimming In A Muslim Sea

2010-10-29T20:58:00.001-05:00

"Chairman" Mao was a most horrid man, a mass murderer who facilitated the deaths of many more than even Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot and Genghis Khan. Yet, he was certainly NOT ignorant or irrational (Although he had VERY different premises for his logic).

One of his most famous "thoughts" was that: Revolutionaries swim in the sea of peasants. (Or, urban workers) who either hopefully support such persons or dare not to oppose them or even not actively supporting them. The French and USA ignored this in Viet Nam and lost their wars there.

Now we are being subject to a newly-aggressive, more-violent and heavily-armed Jihadi terrorist movements and individuals who "swim" in the Muslim ruled nations AND also everywhere where even local communities have a Muslim majority or even large minority.
The latter include parts of the UK and France where even para-military police fear to go. If not "seas" or "lakes", there are such swimming holes in many of the Nordic Nations' cities. Such may shortly become true in the Somali neighborhoods of the Twin Cities and the Muslim-Arab dominated city of Dearborn, MI (Where the local police arrested Christians attending an "Arab Festival" who were attempting to demonstrate their First Amendment rights to "the free exercise of religion").

Islam has been at war with us ("Unbelievers") for 1400-plus years; Even if we deny that fact. The response of too many is a syrup-like, and false, "Islam is a religion of peace" OR such absolute denials of reality as "The various terrorist acts of Muslims are not connected with each other".

Islamic terrorists would not survive for 30-days if their peasants (Or Urban equivalents) would turn them in to any like-minded government authorities. Yes, some Muslims fail to do so because of a real fear of physical punishment OR social isolation. However, I suspect that most Muslims support jihadi as Mohammed, the founder of Islam, insisted that the above-noted war AND the duty of every adult-male Muslim to participate in military Jihad or to support it with "all their wealth" were direct commands from Allah.

Other like, binding and unalterable commands were-and-are towards the destruction of all legal systems other than Sharia, of all governments other than those controlled by Muslims AND all ideologies and true religions other than Islam.

To paraphrase: "Those who fail to study and learn from history will be condemned to repeat it"; And, "There may be peaceful and tolerant Muslims; But, Islam is very war-like and very intolerant

Thanksgiving Proclamations

2010-10-28T20:49:00.002-05:00

Our great, national, holiday of Thanksgiving is again upon us! I think it would be in the best interests of your readers to print one or both of the presidential thanksgiving proclamations reproduced below between now and that celebration so dear to so many families in this land---And, remind all of the historical and real meaning of that day.

GEORGE WASHINGTON’S THANKSGIVING PROCLAMATION – 1789:

“Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly implore His protection and favor; and whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me to recommend to the people of the United States a day of Public Thanksgiving and Prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.

“Now therefore I do recommend and assign Thursday the twenty-six of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that Great and Glorious Being, who is the Beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country, previous to their becoming a nation; for the single manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of His providence, in the courage and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish Constitutions of Government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now instituted; for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

“And also, that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the Great Lord and Ruler of Nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether
in public or private institutions, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people, by constantly being a government of wise,
just, and constitutional laws, discretely and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us) and to bless them with good governments,
peace and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science, among them and us; and generally, to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity an He alone knows to be best.”

Abraham Lincoln statute, Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C. Photo courtesy of Wallbuilders.
Proclamation of Thanksgiving
by the President of the United States of America

The year that is drawing toward its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful years and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the Source from which they come, others have been added which are of so extraordinary a nature that they can not fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever-watchful providence of Almighty God.

In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign states to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere, except in the theater of military conflict, while that theater has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union.

Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the field of peaceful industry to the national defense have not arrested the plow, the shuttle, or the ship; the ax has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than theretofore. Population has steadily increased notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege, and the battlefield, and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.

No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.

It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently, and gratefully acknowledged, as with one heart and one voice, by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my fellow-citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners, or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it, as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes, to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility, and union.

In testimony wherof I have herunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

[Signed]
A. Lincoln

Another All Saints' Day & Protecting Jesus' Flock

2010-10-24T14:54:00.002-05:00

I. The March Of Glory

At my parish's 2005 All Saints' Day mass my pastor gave a homily in which the great saints of old were mentioned and the great numbers of such Holy Ones marching forward through time was presented to the people.

In my mind's eye, I found myself seeing many columns of God's saints marching behind their special patrons: All the brown-robed Franciscans and those of that persuasion behind St. Francis of Assisi and St. Claire of that same town; Dominicans and many saintly scholars behind St. Dominic, St. Thomas of Aquino and St. Albert the Great; Those attorneys who, somehow, have become saints behind St. Thomas More; All good pastors (Including our beloved John Paul II) Poland's St. John Kanty; And, so forth---Each behind her or his leader in the march to glory.

As for myself, I hope to someday (If that term has any meaning in eternity) take my very, very, humble place behind St. Bernard of Clairvaux (Doctor of the Church and author of De Laude Novae Militae). My view of his column of saints puts the Knights of The Temple (Knights Templar), with their swords used and bloody wounds suffered in the defense of the Holy Land against the followers of that false prophet Mohammed, first behind him. Following them are such as: The Spanish Crusaders who drove those Muslims out of Iberia; King Jan of Poland and all the Poles who suffered, died and yet were victorious at the gates of Vienna and many other places against the Muslim-Turkish hordes; Don Juan of Austria and all of the brave seamen who sent the Turkish fleet to the deeps in defense of Christianity and true Civilization; And, the true Crusaders of today who battle the false, Muslim, prophet Osama bin Laden and his ilk throughout the world.

We should not forget the other false prophets such as the: “Two Emperor Gang” of World War I; The Nazis and Imperial Japan & foolish Italy of World War II; And the atheist communist and very false leaders, Lenin, Stalin Pol Pot, Mao and all of that evil lot. In defense of my nation, Christianity and Civilization [I did serve for three years in the US Navy, this being my only claim to be a follower of St. Bernard and his holy warriors]---Among which are those who suffered and died at such places as Flanders' fields, the Bataan Death March, Normandy's beaches and hedgerows, upon and under the the too-hot and too-cold mountains of Korea, the streets of Baghdad, the jungles of Viet Nam and all the other places where evil is confronted, by true knights, throughout history and the world.

TO THOSE WHO MAINTIAIN THAT THERE ARE NOT JUST WARS AND THAT THE BATTLES FOUGHT, EVEN TODAY. AGAINST THE FOLLOWS OF SUCH FALSE PROPHETS AS MOHAMMED AND OSAMA BIN LADEN ARE NOT JUST WARS WILL BE UNLIKELY TO BE AMONG THE FOLLOWER OF ST. BERNARD ON THE ROAD TO GLORY---OR OF ANY OTHER IN THAT GRAND PROCESSION OF THOSE WHO DEFEND TRUTH AGAINST LIES AND GOOD AGAINST EVIL

II. Protecting Jesus' Flock

We Christians are all parts of Jesus' flock. We are not all lambs or ewes. Fortunately there are still stalwart rams who are ready to defend that flock---Especially when the wethers(ie Castrated sheep) of the Church are more interested in "reaching out to and having dialogue with" the Wolves of Islam than in protecting their flocks. Unfortunately, those cowardly sheep AND bad shepherds include too many (Most?) of the bishops and far too many in the Holy See. This category also extends to all pathological-pacifists and the leaders of some other Christian Churches.

Islam & Like Religious Veneer Terrorist Groups

2010-10-18T20:04:00.002-05:00

Some time ago I became convinced (On the basis of its teachings and collective behaviors) that Islam is NOT a religion but a criminal-terrorist movement with a very thin veneer of religion. It is the largest of such ideologies; But, is no more a true religion than those other like anti-civilization movements as the KKK, Mafia/Cosa-Nostra, Chinese Triads, (Drug dealers') Santeria and Santa Muerte and probably like and lesser known groups.

The first step to save civilization from the Islamic cancer is to declare (By legislative action, judicial decision and through the media) that Islam is NOT a religion and is evil in many of its teachings and the record if its evil deeds as continue to this day in such places as The Sudan, the Philippines, Thailand, and the USA.

Basic Gun Law Resource

2010-10-15T08:42:00.002-05:00

.

"WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT SECURES AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT: The Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of States or a right restricted to persons serving in militias"; August 24, 2004; MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; As found at,
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm

It should be specially noted, where ever there is the tradition of British laws, that the cited opinion is based on those legal traditions as much as on the US Constitution.

2010-10-15T08:41:00.001-05:00

Who Is My Neighbor?

2010-10-07T08:43:00.003-05:00

"Who is my neighbor?" is the essential question for all Christians and many others. The Christ responded by using a Samaritan, of a people detested by the Jews, as an example of a peaceful and charitable (ie Of Love) person.
Certainly, He did not use the bandits who attacked the victim in this parable as examples of such. (Had I been there I might have said: "Master, what should the Samaritan have done if he arrived while the attack-and-robbery was in process?")

Are the unborn our neighbors as to offering them protection? Certainly as they are the absolute innocents having no blame of their own; The same according to the Church as children up to about seven-years of age. What puzzles me is that the Church will not declare that Natural Law allows, if not requires, the use of any level of force to prevent abortions or child abuse.

The same question applies to protecting the "life and dignity of all" as, for example, in The Sudan where loyal followers of the false prophet Mohammed continue to rob, rape and kill in following the teachings of the Koran, this being a all too common facet of Islamic aggression over the last 1400-years and in much of the World.

Are those aggressive-and-criminal Muslims our "neighbors" or are they very much more as the bandits in the parable? Do we have a natural law right (And duty?) to defend ourselves and innocent others from attacks by such AND not limiting ourselves to aiding the hurt-and-injured and burying the dead victims.? Do we have a duty to "strike blows for Christ" as supported by that "Doctor Of The Church" St. Bernard of Clairvaux?. Must we hold our defenses until the sword is swinging at our necks, our girl-children seized, guns are fired at us and the fire-bombs thrown at our church-buildings OR may we take preemptive actions against those who are fiercely advocating and preparing to make such attacks?

I specially am interested in the last question as Mohammed declared war against all "unbelievers" over 1400-years ago, a state-of-war which continues and no true-believing Mujslim will publicly deny and reject!

A Parable From Berkley, Califonia

2010-09-30T08:35:00.001-05:00

A schoolteacher explains in the very politically correct and very political Berkley (CA) school system proclaimed to her fourth-grade class that she is a supporter of the Democrat Party. She asks her students to raise their hands if they, too, are Democrat supporter. Everyone in the class raises their hand expect one little girl. The teacher looks at the girl with surprise and says, "Janie, why didn't you raise your hand?" "Because I'm not a Democrat," she replied. The teacher, still shocked, asked, "Well, if you are not a Democrat, then who do you support?" "I am a Republican, and proud of it," Janie replied. The teacher could not believe her ears. "Janie, why are you an Republican?" "Because my mum is an Republican, and my dad is an Republican and everyone I love and trust is the same, so I'm a Republican too!" "Well," said the teacher in an obviously annoyed tone, "That is no reason for you to be a Republican. You don't have to be just like your parents and (With a sneer at love and trust) those others all of the time. What if your mum were a moron and your dad were a moron and the same for those others, what would you be then?" "Then," Janie smiled, "I'd be a Democrat."

[Being Berkley, CA that child was suspended from school, referred to a local "shrink" and excluded from school until her dangerous pathology was cured.]

Best Qualificaton For Voting

2010-09-28T20:00:00.002-05:00

Rather than raw political knowledge about the transient members of ;the Government, I suggest the following qualification for all citizens under 30-years of age.

A minimum of 20-months of honorable service in the Armed forces of the USA or the US Coast Guard or (In such dangerous places as East Africa, East Los Angeles, Spanish Harlem) equivalent civilian service (Not less than 300-miles from their home-town) as the Peace Corps, Domestic Peace Corps, US Public Health Service, Etc..

I am also opposed to any person serving as Secretary Of Defense and his/her next two highest level of administrators being allowed to serve without that same and dangerous service.

The voters should consider the prior, dangerous, service of candidates for every elected Federal office.

An Amendment to the Constitution would be required for, at least, the voting restriction above, which might well have a ten year (After ratification) delay to allow citizens to satisfy this requirement. Feminists and real women are welcome into the noted organizations. Twenty-months of "don't ask, don't tell" is not an unreasonable condition.

"Those who would rule should first serve"; A principle generally held by the Western Roman Empire which survived for much, much, longer than the USA has been in existence; If things continue as now, for longer than it will survive.

"The Closing Of The Muslim Mind": A Book Review

2010-09-22T20:15:00.003-05:00

REILLY, Robert R.
The Closing Of The Muslim Mind; How Intellectual Suicide
Created the Modern Islamist Crisis
ISI Books; Wilmington, DE, USA; 2010
ISBN 1-933859-91-1

I must confess that I lacked that sound knowledge of philosophy/theology to fully understand the fullness of the first chapters in this notable book. However, my avocational interest in history allowed me to plow through to the "practical" chapters and content. Although I have provided you with some other reviews far below, my own comments follow here.

1. There was an Islamic "golden age" when many Muslims took the best that other cultures, in their world, to develop Islamic thought. The author noted that the influence of "Athens" (ie Logic and critical thinking) allowed some Muslims to look to "cause and effect", one of the bases of the scientific method, and to use logic in an effort to understand anything, including the nature of God/Allah. Much of what had been lost in the West of "Athens" (And other intellectual treasures in lands conquered by Islam) was saved and sent back to the West. During this time much of what some of today's Muslims present (Perhaps as "disinformation") to non-Muslims as evidence of the flexibility and openness of Muslims.
2. During that era some Muslims used the above methods to develop critical-and-scientific thinking and began the development of physical science in the Muslim world.
3. To the detriment of the Islamic world, Muslims and all others in this world The persons controlling policy and teachings in Islam attacked the intellectual methods noted above and condemned all such thinking as shirk (ie Heresy) and harram (Forbidden), to the extent that the possibility of the death-penalty was a possible-probable fate for any Muslims who wished to use the noted and rational approaches to knowledge and thinking.The focus became blind obedience (Of course as guided by the legalistic "thinkers" of the newer and retrograde Islam), It was maintained that nothing could occur without the direct intervention of Allah, even to the extent that Hydrogen and Oxygen could not become water without His allowing such. This newer Islam eliminated any NATURAL LAW, in the physical or moral worlds.
4. I do note that Mr. Reilly did declare that the above came out of the Sunni branch of Islam; But, also noted that today's use of the Internet and the influence of the extremist Islam supported by the oil-rich Saudis has been spreading this view to other Islamic communities/sects.
5, This blind obedience and lack of moral Natural Law has led to a wide-spread:Lack of consideration of any "unbelievers" or outsiders as real human beings; And, a willingness to put into active effect those Koran-based teachings which allow or encourage, and often command, the use of murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, and the other horrors presented by Mohammed as the actual and unalterable (Since Mohammed's death) words of Allah. There is also an expressed preference for the "use of the sword" to "spread the word".
6. Some years ago I forced myself to read Hitler's Mein Kampf. After reading the Koran I found too many parallels (Hatred of Jews, Anti-Intellectualism, desire to destroy all other ideologies/religions, a glorification of violence, Etc.) to be willing to accept either as a guideline for human-humane behaviors and society.

My hope is that all teachers whose classes touch on Islam, all non-Muslim religious leaders, all elected and policy setting appointed officials, editors-and-publishers, TV "talking heads", senior military and diplomatic staff and all other "thought leaders" become aware of Mr.Reilly's work and thoughts AND integrate them into their policies, teachings, commentary, editorials, sermons, etc.. As to Christian leaders who become aware of this book, failure to read, understand and apply its lessons could well be considered a sin against that religion or treason against its daughter, Western Civilization (Or, such of it as is left to us). The same treason could be assigned to the other noted persons who do the same as well as "misconduct in office" or very unprofessional conduct.

Of course, it would be best if the like Muslim officials, teachers, etc. took this book's lessons to heart and returned Islam to a rational and golden age.

New Words For Our Era

2010-09-18T20:55:00.002-05:00

Every age requires or generates new words to reflect the spirit of the ear and to provide a shorthand method of expressing thoughts and concepts which would otherwise require sentences or phases ore even paragraphs to express. "Radar", "beat", "WMD", "N-word" and others are four among many thousands of such terms. Below is my offering of four ;more, which should be approved for use by your staff via your publication's "style book" and also used in the broadcast media.

obama, noun: A lie so blatant that only the mentally limited or intoxicated cannot fail to recognize it as such; But, one which most will not declare a lie for fear of being called a "racist". This should noun should now replace the less emphatic sharpton.

to muslim-speak. verb: To tell lies no less than obamas in magnitude; But, with the intent of providing military-type disinformation to excuse-or-cover the methods (eg Murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, perpetual war with unbelievers, treaty-breaking) and the goals of Islam (eg Destruction of all religions-or-ideologies other than Islam, Placement of the entire world under the rule of Muslims, Replacement all political-and-legal systems with Sharia).

islamoforia noun: The state of being on-guard against Islam; Based on the Greek word for being on-guard; To replace, for a free and armed People, the word "Islamophobia".

homoaidia noun: The normal state or reaction of most males to being confronted with the physical actions of male homosexuals; Based on the Greek word for disgust or revulsion; To normally replace the word homophobia, except where minor children are involved.

================================================================

These new words can be adapted in such sentences as below.

"The obamas put forth by Iman Feisal Rauf, about the "9/11" Mosque, surely raised my
level of islamoforia!"

"The films of the Sydney, Australia's "gay pride mob" maxed-out my homoaidia!"

Isalm, Christianity, Truth & Teaching Muslims

2010-09-11T11:03:00.000-05:00

Too many "Christian religions leaders" and editors/publishers of "Christian" periodicals are so ignorant of history (Or, for devious reasons, w, or with most Muslims; But, with a small number of terrorists who are Muslim.

They are dangerously wrong! The war was declared by Mohammed, against all "unbelievers", more than 1400-years ago and is perpetual until all such either join Islam or accept the degrading and slave-like status of dhimitude. This war continues throughout the world, to this day, in such places as The Sudan, other parts of Africa, Thailand, The Philippines and the USA.

That war is called Jihad which may be conducted by individuals (eg Major Hasan of Fort Hood treason & infamy), small groups (eg The 19 "martyrs" of "9/11"), State supported bands (The janjaweed of The Sudan) and even national armies.

Islam requires that all of its adult males wage military/violent jihad or "support it with all their wealth" (The end point of much/most "Islamic charities").

Islam itself is NOT a religion; But, a criminal-terrorist movement whose basic teachings allow or encourage the use of murder, rape and enslavement, genocide, the above-noted perpetual war, unjust treatment of women and "unbelievers" with the goal of destroying all forms of government and law other than under Sharia. That Islam is a religion is the biggest lie in history---And, makes a liar of everyone who repeats it.

As a Christian I am not to hate individuals (eg Muslims); But, I do hate Islam and will support all efforts to destroy it and those who wage war or plan to wage war in its name.

Since we are at war with Islam (As declared by Mohammed and continued by his followers to this day), we should make the same efforts we used to destroy Nazism. Any future "9/11" style attack should be answered by an "object lesson"; The only problem is selecting the right target.
This would not be a matter of vengeance or revenge; But, an matter of educating the followers of this foul ideology that sins require penance and crimes require punishment in a "language", the only one, they understand.

For those who beat the drum of forgiving enemies, I am willing to do so (We should be willing to do so) when the sinners admit their offenses with the real intent of not repeating them! ('Go and sin no more".)

Failure to tell the truth about Islam (Or forwarding it in any manner) is "bearing false witness" against the multitude of the victims of that Nazi-like ideology and is evil in itself by any such acts of commission or omission.

The Koran: A "Holy Book"?

2010-09-10T08:07:00.002-05:00

Some years ago I forced myself to read a book (And its related documents) which had hatred of Jews as a core idea, glorified war, expressed a general hatred of those who disagreed with the author and led to a great war and gross acts of genocide. That book was A. Hitler's "Mein Kampf".

More recently I read a like book (And associated documents) which has much the same theme, has resulted in a 1400-year history of aggressive wars and many acts of genocide to this day in such places as the Sudan. That book is the Koran.

Now, is the "Koran" a "holy book"?????

I Will Burn Hate Literature

2010-09-09T09:25:00.001-05:00

I am, with the intent of very publicly burning such, collecting some hate-filled books and other literature. This act may result in in some feeling that their ideology, that ideology's founder and, in some cases, ethnic background were the subject of deadly insults. However, as that literature allows or encourages or glorifies, and often commands, the use of murder, enslavement, genocide, war, the establishment of one group of people of being superior to all others, they will be burnt before as many persons and news reporters as possible!

That printed material includes, but is not limited to, such as: Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf; Other Nazi publications; Many pre-1945 Japanese government and press documents; The same for that from the misrule of Bonito Mussolini; The terrible edicts of J. Stalin and Pravda press releases and Mao's writings.

What did you think I would be burning? Did I miss some such hate-filled book?

De Laude Novae Militae--Revisted

2010-09-05T07:04:00.004-05:00

DE LAUDE NOVAE MILITAE: REVISITED

by James Pawlak

7 January 2004
1st Revision: 2 August 2004
2nd Revision: 28 November 2005

Benedictus dominus deus meus qui docet manus meas ad proelium.

“IN PRAISE OF THE NEW KNIGHTHOOD”--INTRODUCTION:: This work was written by Saint Bernard of Clairvaux one of the few declared “Doctors of the Church” in the year of our Lord, 1129 and was addressed to the first Master General of the Military Order of Templars. Although almost 1,000-years old, this document can still speak to us at a time when the Churches and Peoples of God are under external and internal attack by those who would destroy them and leave only a desolation of moral and intellectual emptiness as is the apparent goal of the Evil One.

THE AUTHOR AND HIS AUTHORITY: Saint Bernard was born in 1070 and died in August, 1153. As a “Doctor of the Church” his writings have great weight in the definitions of what is the correct view of the Church and its teachings. It applies to all Christians in all subsequent times, especially those under attack by the followers of that false pseudo-prophet Mohamed.

DE LAUDE NOVAE MILITAE-THEN: This work addressed the spiritual direction of what was then a new order of knights, the Templars, who were pristine in their commitment to the Church and their willingness to physically protect it in the Holy Land. If that Order became corrupt at a later date (The downfall of the Templars may have been caused by the greed of a French king and jealousy within the Church), that does not detract from the teachings of St. Bernard and the value of such knighthood in 1129AD; And for all who are, formally or informally, knights who protect us from evil, even to this time..

This direction was specially needed after the misbehavior of some crusaders in both Constantinople and in the Holy Land.

DE LAUDE NOVAE MILITAE—NOW AND IN THE FUTURE: At the very least and at this time the Church is being attacked by external enemies, generally “muslims”, in the Sudan, the Philippines and in other places. Many of those who support the teachings of the Koran and the Hadith are attacking (Directly or by giving active support to those who do) all civilization every where, even in “islamic” nations. This is not a new conflict as those who follow the teachings of that false and pernicious prophet Mohamed have, for more than 1400-years, have continued their adherence to the Koran's commands for aggressive war (Jihad) against all others and, thereby, work the evil of retail murder, genocide, rape, pillage, the destruction of cultures and the social, political, legal and economic subjugation of those not “muslims” and of all women.
It seems reasonable that we need a new military order of knights who will have that same commitment as did the early Templars and will follow the teachings of St. Bernard as to the proper way in which to be knights and to “fight the good fight”. Why?
Because, with the exception of too few in the USA and even fewer in other places, no one in this world is willing to declare the truth about the danger of “islam” (Perhaps motivated to silence by Arab controlled oil or pathological pacifism or “political correctness” or (Like France} a large and aggressive “muslim” community or a hate of the Churches' moral teachings (Which teachings confront their self-centered, fragile and meaningless senses-of-self-worth).

Therefore, we now require some organized force or agreeable class of unorganized persons who will defend the Churches of God and civilization from such attacks as now exist and have existed for almost 1500-years.

What then did Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, Doctor of the Church, write about the proper way of being a Christian knight?

SAINT BERNARD'S STATEMENTS: I have reviewed the translation of De Laude Novae Militae available to me, edited out those parts which were specific to only the time in which they were wrote, made slightly free with the translation (To suit modern usage) and am left with the following, given as if there were such a new military order in this time and already at work in this world, especially the Middle East.

“It seems that a New Knighthood has recently appeared on the earth, precisely in that part of it, the Orient (nb The Middle East), in which He visited
from on high in the flesh. As He then troubled the princes of darkness in the
strength of His Mighty Hand,so there he now wipes out their followers, the
children of disbelief, scattering them by the hands of His mighty ones. ... This
is, I say, a new kind of knighthood and one unknown to the ages gone by. It
ceaselessly wages a twofold war both against flesh and blood and against a
spiritual army of evil ....

Go forth confidently then, you knights, and repel the foes of the cross of
Christ with a stalwart heart. Know that neither death nor life can separate you from the love of God which is in Jesus Christ; And in every peril repeat, “Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's.” What a glory to return from in victory from such a battle! How blessed to die there as a martyr! Rejoice, brave athlete! If you live and conquer in the Lord; But, glory
and exult even more if you die and join your Lord. Life indeed is a fruitful
thing and victory is glorious, but a holy death is more important than either.
If they are blessed who die in the Lord, how much more are they blessed who die
for the Lord! ....

Indeed, danger or victory for a Christian depends on the dispositions of his
heart and not on the fortunes of war. If he fights for a good reason, the issue
of his fight can never be evil; And, likewise, the results can never be considered
good if the reason were evil and the intentions perverse. If you happen to be
killed while you are seeking only to kill another, you die a murderer. If you
succeed, and by your will to overcome and to conquer you perchance kill a man,
you live a murderer. Not it will not do to be a murderer, living or dead, victorious
or vanquished. What an unhappy victory---To have conquered a man while yielding to vice and to indulge in an empty glory at his fall when wrath and
pride have gotten the better of you. ...

But, the Knights of Christ may safely fight the battles of their Lord, fearing neither sin if they smite the enemy, nor danger at their own death, since to
inflict death or the die for Christ is no sin, but rather, an abundant claim to
glory. In the first case, one gains for Christ, and in the second, on gains
Christ Himself. The Lord freely accepts the death of the foe who has offended
Him, and yet more freely gives Himself for the consolation of the fallen knight.

The knights of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more
confidently, for he serves Christ when he strikes and serves himself when he
falls. Neither does he bear his sword in vain, for he is God's minister, for the
punishment of evildoers and for the praise of the good. If he kills an evildoer, he
is not a mankiller; But, if I may so put it, a killer of evil. He is evidently the avenger of Christ towards evildoers and he is rightly considered a defender
of Christians. ... When he inflicts death it is for Christ's profit and when he
suffers death, it is for his own gain. The Christian glories in the death of
the pagan (nb At that time, “muslims” were considered pagans), because
Christ is glorified ....

I do not mean to say that the pagans are to be slaughtered when there is
any other way to prevent them from harassing and persecuting the faithful,
but only that it now seems better to destroy them than evil should come to theirjust and that the righteous be tempted into wrongdoing (i.e. Converting to
“islam” for economic or social or status reasons OR by force?).

What then? If it is never permissible for a Christian to strike with the sword, why
did the Savior's precursor (nb St. John the Baptist) bid the soldiers to be content with their pay, and not forbid them to follow their calling? ...

Thus when the transgressors of divine law have been expelled, the righteous
nation that keeps the truth may enter in security. Certainly it is proper that
nations who love war should be scattered, and those who trouble us should be
cut off and that all the workers of iniquity should be dispersed .... Let both
swords (Emphasis added; Probably a reference to: Luke 22: 35-38) of the faithful fall upon the necks of the foe, in order to destroy every high thing exalting citself against the knowledge of God, which is the Christian faith ....”

FURTHER COMMENTS: The language of this document is, by modern standards, very elaborate and convoluted. Much of this document applies only to the time in which it was written and to the Jerusalem and Templars of that time.

However, much of the teaching applies to all ages and to the use of military force by Christians. If the Christian warrior avoids pride, vengeance and other like weaknesses and battles only for justice, for the punishment of evildoers and for the protection of innocents (e.g. Christians in “islamic” nations), then killing incidental to such noble activities is not sinful and is not murder.

The calm, without-hate, professional and focused waging of war by the forces of the USA, Poland, the UK and a few other nations in Iraq and Afghanistan appear to generally meet the standards set by this noted Doctor of the Church. The reflective person might compare such knightly waging of war with the emotional, hateful, vengeful and assassin-like behaviors of such organizations as Hitler's SS {Einsatzgruppen}, Serbian genocidists, Latin American death squads, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbullah, Black September, the insane persons who follow Osama bin Laden, those who directed the Iraq-Iran war of a few years ago and too many others to name.

If the modern, Christian, knight now serves under the flag of a secular nation, it does not matter. If such a knight serves privately, it does not matter. What does matter is service up to the standards set by St. Bernard and what is in the mind and heart of every such knightly person.

I note that those who, in Iraq, did not come up to these standards are being punished.

Although St. Bernard questions the propriety of killing to defend ones self, the Catechism Of The Catholic Church declares the ultimate right to self-defense and the duty to defend others to be proper and does not put excessive limits on the use of force to do so; And, by extension and so as to not make that teaching meaningless, on the access to effective and individual weapons when the civil authorities cannot provide effective and immediate protection.

Of course, such a knighthood as is described above cannot flourish in an unjust society (This lack may have been at the base of the failure of the Templars and of the Crusades of ancient times). Therefore, our posited and new knighthood must look to their own society as to instilling justice and morality. By preference, this should be done by the persuasion of others to just and moral ways OR by prayer OR by political and economic actions. Lacking success by those methods, the use of force is justified AND necessary!

CREDITS: The translation, of De Laude Novae Militae, used can be found at the “ORB Online Encyclopedia”. No copyright notices was seen at that site. In any case, this essay is a “fair use” of that material.
This essay is not copyrighted and may be used as the reader sees fit.

MECCA DELENDA EST